Letter to the editor

Following is a response to an FCW.com poll question that asked: "Should federal IT project managers be made to qualify for their jobs?"

Wonders never cease. This is a concern that has been pointed out on your pages several times in the past.

You couldn't get hired for a private-sector information technology management job if you didn't have the credentials. Why should the government be different? Especially since it is taxpayers' money paying government employees' salaries.

After 27 years in the IT business, both private and federal, I have seen far too many managers who have a dim grasp of even their areas of expertise not to mention IT concerns. They have been around the government so long they are just floating to the top through longevity.

There are so-called government IT managers who are IT managers only by virtue of the fact someone dropped a computer on their desks and said, "Tag, you're the new IT guru."

Name withheld by request


We welcome your comments. To send a letter to the editor, use this form.

Please check out the archive of Letters to the Editor for fellow readers' comments.


  • Defense
    Ryan D. McCarthy being sworn in as Army Secretary Oct. 10, 2019. (Photo credit: Sgt. Dana Clarke/U.S. Army)

    Army wants to spend nearly $1B on cloud, data by 2025

    Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy said lack of funding or a potential delay in the JEDI cloud bid "strikes to the heart of our concern."

  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

Stay Connected


Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.