Senate seeks TIA halt

Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency home page

Related Links

The Senate is seeking to halt the Defense Department's controversial Terrorism Information Awareness program.

The Senate version of the Defense appropriations bill includes an amendment, proposed by Sen. Ron. Wyden (D-Ore.), preventing the Defense Department from spending additional money on research and development of TIA.

The controversial project is being developed by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, and involves collecting myriad data on individuals for storage. The system then mines that data in search of suspicious patterns or activities that might relate to terrorism.

The program has spawned both Congressional and public controversy.

Wyden proposed the amendment to the Defense appropriations bill in May. The Bush administration opposed the amendment, saying it strips the government of "an important potential tool in the war on terrorism."

The amendment, however, was passed July 17 as part of the fiscal 2004 spending bill.

Privacy advocates are monitoring the bill as it goes to conference committee to see whether the amendment remains in the final version. The House appropriations bill for DOD, which passed on July 8 with little debate, carried no such provision.

Featured

  • Cybersecurity

    DHS floats 'collective defense' model for cybersecurity

    Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wants her department to have a more direct role in defending the private sector and critical infrastructure entities from cyberthreats.

  • Defense
    Defense Secretary James Mattis testifies at an April 12 hearing of the House Armed Services Committee.

    Mattis: Cloud deal not tailored for Amazon

    On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to quell "rumors" that the Pentagon's planned single-award cloud acquisition was designed with Amazon Web Services in mind.

  • Census
    shutterstock image

    2020 Census to include citizenship question

    The Department of Commerce is breaking with recent practice and restoring a question about respondent citizenship last used in 1950, despite being urged not to by former Census directors and outside experts.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.