Fudging on fees

Since 1995, the General Services Administration has financed its schedule purchasing program through the collection of a 1 percent (soon to be 0.75 percent) Industrial Funding Fee (IFF). This fee, which is incorporated into contractors' published schedule prices, is paid by purchasing agencies and then collected by contractors as part of the sales price. They pass it on to GSA on a quarterly basis.

Considerable confusion exists regarding whether contractors must pay the IFF on sales to federal purchasers outside GSA schedule contract buys. Such sales arise primarily in two contexts.

First, a contractor may sell a product from a schedule contract to a federal buyer under an unrelated federal contract. Second, a contractor may sell a nonschedule product to a federal buyer in conjunction with, but not as part of, a schedule sale (i.e., an "open-market" order).

GSA's guidance on those situations has been inconsistent. Some within the agency maintain that a contractor owes the IFF in both. Others argue that the fee is due only in the second scenario. But I submit that one would be hard-pressed to find legal support for an IFF payment in either situation.

In the first case, according to applicable federal regulations, a contractor's IFF payment is calculated on the value of sales "under [the schedule] contract." Obviously, a sale made under a different contract is not made under the schedule contract.

Purchasing agencies, however, do not always clearly identify the contract under which a purchase is being made. This puts contractors at a disadvantage because GSA takes the position — supported by some case law — that a federal purchase of products using a schedule contract is presumed to be a schedule purchase unless the agency says otherwise.

In the second scenario, a fee should not be owed, either. An open-market sale, by definition, is not a schedule sale.

Agencies must satisfy procurement competition requirements, and the purchase price typically does not include the IFF. Thus, a contractor should not have to remit the fee on such sales. Remember, it is supposed to be the agency that pays the IFF, not the contractor.

Against this background, it seems that a contractor can protect itself best by:

Instructing federal sales representatives to ask purchasers whether they are buying under the schedule contract. If not, they should reference the appropriate contract number on the purchase order and invoice.

Explicitly identifying open-market orders on GSA's price list and making clear that the price of such items does not include the IFF.

Maintaining clear and complete records regarding all federal sales.

Although these steps will not necessarily move GSA from its sometimes overly broad interpretation of the IFF clause, it will put contractors on more solid ground to defend themselves should the need arise.

Aronie is a partner in the government contracts group at Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton. He can be reached at jaronie@sheppardmullin.com.

The Fed 100

Save the date for 28th annual Federal 100 Awards Gala.

Featured

  • computer network

    How Einstein changes the way government does business

    The Department of Commerce is revising its confidentiality agreement for statistical data survey respondents to reflect the fact that the Department of Homeland Security could see some of that data if it is captured by the Einstein system.

  • Defense Secretary Jim Mattis. Army photo by Monica King. Jan. 26, 2017.

    Mattis mulls consolidation in IT, cyber

    In a Feb. 17 memo, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis told senior leadership to establish teams to look for duplication across the armed services in business operations, including in IT and cybersecurity.

  • Image from Shutterstock.com

    DHS vague on rules for election aid, say states

    State election officials had more questions than answers after a Department of Homeland Security presentation on the designation of election systems as critical U.S. infrastructure.

  • Org Chart Stock Art - Shutterstock

    How the hiring freeze targets millennials

    The government desperately needs younger talent to replace an aging workforce, and experts say that a freeze on hiring doesn't help.

  • Shutterstock image: healthcare digital interface.

    VA moves ahead with homegrown scheduling IT

    The Department of Veterans Affairs will test an internally developed scheduling module at primary care sites nationwide to see if it's ready to service the entire agency.

  • Shutterstock images (honglouwawa & 0beron): Bitcoin image overlay replaced with a dollar sign on a hardware circuit.

    MGT Act poised for a comeback

    After missing in the last Congress, drafters of a bill to encourage cloud adoption are looking for a new plan.

Reader comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group