Counterpoint: A missed opportunity

An important aspect has been largely overlooked in the considerable analysis of the impact on an agency and its employees regarding a proposed new human resources system for the Homeland Security

Department.

In its headlong rush for unaccountable control, DHS has missed an extraordinary opportunity to revitalize government personnel processes in balanced ways. At a time when DHS is still developing its organizational values and culture, it is proposing to practically cut its workers out of the process.

Proposing regulations that effectively gut employee due process rights and turn away from real collective bargaining only jeopardizes the agency's critical need to build a valued and respected workforce.

The proposed changes in pay, labor relations and employee due process rights for DHS send ominous signals not only for agency employees but also for

fulfillment of the agency's mission. Similar to the DHS employees we represent, the National Treasury Employees Union does not believe that radical changes are needed for the pay and performance systems.

The basic structure of the General Schedule is sound. NTEU recognizes that positive changes could be made to the pay system that would also serve to emphasize and enhance performance.

Rather, DHS wants to implement

an untested pay banding plan based largely on managerial discretion. There is no evidence that such plans work effectively.

In labor relations, DHS would effectively bar meaningful employee involvement in vital workplace

matters. It is hard to understand why. Collective bargaining provides the forum for employee perspectives and insights to be aired — and frontline employees have the best view of how the work actually gets done.

More broadly, apparently it isn't enough for DHS to curb employee bargaining rights. The agency also wants to eliminate the role of the independent Federal Labor Relations Authority and funnel any disputes into the hands of a three-member internal board appointed by the DHS secretary. That is neither appropriate nor wise. A true system of collective bargaining requires an independent third-party determination of disputes.

Finally, according to the DHS proposals, employee due process rights would be gutted. Employees would not have the right to ask an impartial arbitrator to consider serious adverse actions against them. For those disciplinary matters that could be taken before the Merit Systems Protection Board, a significantly lower burden of proof for DHS makes it much more likely that managerial decisions on discipline will prevail, whether justified or not.

The board would no longer be able to modify agency-imposed penalties, thus preventing this impartial body from directing the agency to change unreasonable penalties. And DHS officials are proposing to allow their secretary to determine an unlimited number of offenses that require mandatory termination, without access to an independent review of the charges.

Employees must see a successful human resources management system as fair, credible and transparent. In these three key areas, and in others, DHS proposals fail to provide for such a system.

Kelley is president of the National Treasury Employees Union.

Featured

  • Cybersecurity

    DHS floats 'collective defense' model for cybersecurity

    Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wants her department to have a more direct role in defending the private sector and critical infrastructure entities from cyberthreats.

  • Defense
    Defense Secretary James Mattis testifies at an April 12 hearing of the House Armed Services Committee.

    Mattis: Cloud deal not tailored for Amazon

    On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to quell "rumors" that the Pentagon's planned single-award cloud acquisition was designed with Amazon Web Services in mind.

  • Census
    shutterstock image

    2020 Census to include citizenship question

    The Department of Commerce is breaking with recent practice and restoring a question about respondent citizenship last used in 1950, despite being urged not to by former Census directors and outside experts.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.