GAO: Feds can improve critical cybersecurity

Cybersecurity for Critical Infrastructure Protection

Related Links

Although the private sector owns most of the nation's critical infrastructures, the federal government has several options to improve cybersecurity of such assets, including developing an overall framework that defines responsibilities, identifies assets and establishes standards, according to a General Accounting Office report released this week.

Such a critical infrastructure protection (CIP) plan would help the federal government assess risks, provide threat and vulnerability information to the private sector, enhance information sharing and promote awareness. The government could also better allocate resources or provide tax incentives or other policies for greater adoption of such technologies.

The GAO report said the federal government could take actions to protect its own systems as an example for others to emulate as well as take long-term actions to increase the quality and availability of such technologies in the marketplace. The report provided several actions by federal agencies in this area, such as development of an overall CIP plan by December.

It's important for the government to consider the scope of the problem, costs, benefits and other issues, the report said, as well as the technology issues surrounding the problem and structure of the security marketplace.

"To help determine the problem approach for the federal action, the government will require information from the private sector on the scope and size of the cybersecurity problem and the actions that the private sector is already taking to address the problem," the report said. Later, it added that sometimes the best course of action for the federal government "may be to take no action at all" if private-sector responses are adequate.

The report also said ultimately protection of the critical infrastructure — some 85 percent -- falls to its private owners. There are many cybersecurity technologies available that help, but the report said many aren't being purchased or implemented to the fullest extent.

An overall framework can help assist the selection of such technologies, including determining business requirements for security, performing risk assessments, establishing a security policy, implementing a solution that involves people, processes and technologies, and continuously monitoring and managing security.

"Despite the availability of current cybersecurity technologies, there is a demonstrated need for new technologies," the report added. "Long-term efforts are needed, such as the development of standards, research into cybersecurity vulnerabilities and technological solutions, and the transition of research results into commercially available products."

Featured

  • Defense
    Soldiers from the Old Guard test the second iteration of the Integrated Visual Augmentation System (IVAS) capability set during an exercise at Fort Belvoir, VA in Fall 2019. Photo by Courtney Bacon

    IVAS and the future of defense acquisition

    The Army’s Integrated Visual Augmentation System has been in the works for years, but the potentially multibillion deal could mark a paradigm shift in how the Defense Department buys and leverages technology.

  • Cybersecurity
    Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas  (U.S. Coast Guard photo by Petty Officer 3rd Class Lora Ratliff)

    Mayorkas announces cyber 'sprints' on ransomware, ICS, workforce

    The Homeland Security secretary announced a series of focused efforts to address issues around ransomware, critical infrastructure and the agency's workforce that will all be launched in the coming weeks.

Stay Connected