DOD wants standardized platform for weapons use

The Defense Department’s transformation initiative has “built up a bow wave of change,” Air Force Maj. Gen. Marc “Buck” Rogers said at last week’s Joint Warfare 2004 conference in Arlington, Va.

But military restructuring and user training must advance far more rapidly, until “any certified controller from any service can control any weapon platform,” Rogers said at the conference, sponsored by Defense News Media Group.

“We need a common, deployable, standardized command-and-control facility to work in and train for, just like we use a workstation in ordinary jobs,” he said.

It might look like a workstation, Rogers said, “but it’s called a weapon station, and it will have hundreds of switches. There’s no time for hunt-and-peck” searching for the right tool at a weapon station; the key is training for decision-makers as well as shooters.

Basketballs and footballs

Besides a common weapon station, the military services must have interoperable data, he said. “We need one common format for data, whether it’s WAV files or pixels. Why can’t all applications recognize what they are and open them automatically? Basketballs don’t look or behave like footballs. Applications should recognize the difference.”

Force transformation is bringing some unintended consequences, Rogers added. For example, the flood of network-centric data is camouflaging the needed information.

“In World War I, we got 30 words per minute from field phones,” he said. “In the first Gulf War we had 192,000 words per minute from networks. By 2010 we’ll have 1.5 trillion words per minute from wideband data links.”

The future warrior will have not only tremendously greater situational awareness and massless weapons, he also will be far more mobile, said Arthur K. Cebrowski, the Pentagon’s director of force transformation. “It will be the age of the small, the fast and the many,” leading to military organization by squads instead of larger units.

“The smaller your professional army, the more civilians are involved in defense,” Cebrowski said. “It’s a big focus shift” from fighting traditional wars to preparing for terrorism, weapons of mass destruction and unexpected, disruptive technologies such as laser weapons.

“Traditional capabilities can’t fight them,” he said. “Give up the notion of the one best system or the one best provider. Develop a broader mix.”

The future streams of net-centric data, Cebrowski predicted, will force DOD to realign its information management activities under a CIO.

About the Author

Connect with the GCN staff on Twitter @GCNtech.

Featured

  • Cybersecurity
    Boy looks under voting booth at Ventura Polling Station for California primary Ventura County, California. Joseph Sohm / Shutterstock.com

    FBI breach notice rules lauded by states, but some want more

    A recent policy change by the FBI would notify states when their local election systems are hacked, but some state officials and lawmakers want the feds to inform a broader range of stakeholders in the election ecosystem.

  • paths (cybrain/Shutterstock.com)

    Does strategic planning help organizations?

    Steve Kelman notes growing support for strategic planning efforts -- and the steps agencies take to keep those plans relevant.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.