Editorial: Sexing up EA

nterprise architectures have come a long way in a relatively short period of time. Most agencies not only have one but also use it to help them make decisions, in most cases.

There is no better illustration of that progress than when Tom Ridge was named secretary of the Homeland Security Department and said that establishing an enterprise architecture was a top priority.

Those responsible for developing and implementing such architectures generally acknowledge that most senior agency officials and frontline workers understand the importance of enterprise architectures. The problem, they argue, is educating those in between.

The difficulty with enterprise architectures is that they simply do not have much meaning for those outside information technology and

chief information officer offices. Even some people within IT shops regard architectures as an exercise that they do not fully understand or

appreciate.

The lack of understanding is, at least in part, the result of enterprise architectures' complexity. As with so many concepts in the IT world, enterprise architecture has its own culture and language. Just a quick pop quiz: How many of us really know what a reference model is? And how many could explain the relationship between the federal enterprise architecture and individual agency enterprise architectures?

As part of this week's feature, we answered some frequently asked

questions under the assumption that some of you, even within the IT community, do not fully understand all of the elements of enterprise

architecture.

The goal of an architecture is a good one: to move beyond stand-alone systems to those that use resources and data more efficiently. But getting there seems overly complex. And the language of enterprise architecture is a big hurdle to overcome if the goal is to become a reality for those who are not CIOs and IT officials.

Office of Management and Budget officials are in the process of hiring a new enterprise architect. We hope this person, working with members of the CIO Council, can come up with a creative way to broaden the understanding of this important concept.

No small task, but a very important one.

Featured

  • Defense
    Ryan D. McCarthy being sworn in as Army Secretary Oct. 10, 2019. (Photo credit: Sgt. Dana Clarke/U.S. Army)

    Army wants to spend nearly $1B on cloud, data by 2025

    Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy said lack of funding or a potential delay in the JEDI cloud bid "strikes to the heart of our concern."

  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.