You flunked the test

Too much time is spent testing software development projects.

Here's a trick question: When is software testing a bad thing? Usually considered a virtue in short supply, software testing can also be a vice. That may be the case when it comes to government problems with fielding enterprise resource planning (ERP) software.

At least that's the view of Mark Johnson, lead partner in IBM Public Sector's ERP practice. He believes the kind of exhaustive testing government ERP programs undergo is unnecessary.

"We go through that process of testing and testing and testing that was developed for custom-developed software and not for commercial software," he said at the Air Force Information Technology Conference in 2004.

It is possible to streamline the testing process and not give up any quality. Agencies could test ERP modules as they are developed and then string them together for a final test at the end of the program, he said. Agencies would be better off if officials spent more time at the beginning of the process to better gather user requirements, Johnson said.

The current testing process is a result of pulling together too few requirements upfront, said Lisa Mascolo, a managing partner at Accenture. Without such an assessment, users start to notice deficiencies in what they need too late in the program, she said. Extensive reworking of the software is then required, and those changes in turn need testing.

"But agencies are strapped for knowledgeable and qualified people," she said. "We often find that the most qualified people who should be involved in the initial requirements phase are doing their everyday jobs and are not available [for the ERP project] then."

Nevertheless, Johnson said the way government does things is outmoded, and something must be done to allow for change.

About the Author

Brian Robinson is a freelance writer based in Portland, Ore.

Featured

  • Defense
    Ryan D. McCarthy being sworn in as Army Secretary Oct. 10, 2019. (Photo credit: Sgt. Dana Clarke/U.S. Army)

    Army wants to spend nearly $1B on cloud, data by 2025

    Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy said lack of funding or a potential delay in the JEDI cloud bid "strikes to the heart of our concern."

  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.