GAO upholds COMMITS protest

A small business that was not chosen to be part of the Commerce Department's Commerce Information Technology Solutions Next Generation (COMMITS NexGen) contract has had its protest upheld.

Government Accountability Office officials ruled that Commerce officials improperly evaluated past performance factors for Mil.

In considering the companies that were bidding for a spot on the multiple-award contract, Commerce officials gave them ratings on a variety of factors and then an overall rating. Officials used a color code, with blue being the best. A rating of green was one step down from blue, yellow meant worse than average and red the worst possible.

Commerce officials rated Mil's past performance awards red, on the grounds that of the five contract awards that Mil had submitted, four were made to entities other than Mil and the fifth was not relevant to the work that companies will perform under COMMITS NexGen, according to GAO's report.

In filing a protest, Mil officials contended that Commerce officials should have awarded the company a neutral rating after deciding that the past performance examples were not suitable, although the company also argues that that determination was mistaken.

GAO officials noted that Mil received high marks in almost every other factor. Its pricing, for one, was significantly lower than many other firms. The company had an overall green ranking among the companies that bid for COMMITS in its size class.

Although the contract is set aside for small businesses, it divides small businesses into three tiers to ensure that larger small businesses don't take work away from the smallest of the small firms. Mil was in the middle tier. Commerce officials gave spots on the contract to 24 such Tier II businesses, all of which rated blue overall.

GAO officials recommended that Commerce officials reconsider Mil's past performance examples. If agency officials still deem them irrelevant, Mil should get a neutral rating instead of a red and have its overall status re-evaluated. If they are instead found to be relevant after all, they should be scored accordingly, the GAO recommended.

Featured

  • Defense
    Soldiers from the Old Guard test the second iteration of the Integrated Visual Augmentation System (IVAS) capability set during an exercise at Fort Belvoir, VA in Fall 2019. Photo by Courtney Bacon

    IVAS and the future of defense acquisition

    The Army’s Integrated Visual Augmentation System has been in the works for years, but the potentially multibillion deal could mark a paradigm shift in how the Defense Department buys and leverages technology.

  • Cybersecurity
    Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas  (U.S. Coast Guard photo by Petty Officer 3rd Class Lora Ratliff)

    Mayorkas announces cyber 'sprints' on ransomware, ICS, workforce

    The Homeland Security secretary announced a series of focused efforts to address issues around ransomware, critical infrastructure and the agency's workforce that will all be launched in the coming weeks.

Stay Connected