War is hell, 2006 update; Real-life Army/Navy video game battle; A hundred billion here…

War is hell, 2006 update
Earlier this month Wonkette, a way-inside-the-Beltway blog, reported complaints from Marines in Iraq that the Network Operations and Security Center at Quantico had prevented them from playing video games on the Non-secure IP Router Network and blocked access to Web-based mail services offered by Yahoo and Hotmail.

The center even blocked access to — gasp! — Wonkette, which perceived a conspiracy to prevent Marines from visiting Web sites that aren’t supportive of Bush administration policies. As a former Marine radio operator, my mind reels at the thought of Wonkette-deprived Marines. But a Marine Corps spokesman told us that limited bandwidth and not a conspiracy hatched in some dark corner of Quantico was the reason behind the blocking of nonessential Web sites and game networks.

He said facilities in Iraq offer off-duty Marines ample opportunity to play video games. During work hours, he added, they should use military networks for work.

We could not agree more. After all, video game playing eats up scarce Web resources better used to send hundreds of copies of multimegabyte Microsoft PowerPoint slides on network management policies to everyone above the rank of captain.

All the blog fuss makes us yearn for the halcyon days of the old corps, when Marines read Playboy or played high-stakes poker in a foxhole while slurping C-ration coffee heated up with tabs of C-4.

Real-life Army/Navy video game battle
The Army started free distribution of its video game recruiting tool, “America’s Army,” in 2002 and managed to hook more than 6 million players in a couple of years. The game has morphed into the baseline for developing inexpensive simulation and training tools for active-duty and reserve forces.

The success of “America’s Army” rests with programmers at the Naval Postgraduate School’s Modeling, Virtual Environments and Simulation Institute, which the Army enlisted to develop the game for about $13.4 million.

The Army, however, was not exactly grateful for the programmers’ work and complained to the Navy inspector general about mismanagement of the project. The Navy IG sent the complaint to the Defense Department’s IG, which issued a report earlier this year criticizing the Army for the way it funded the project.

The IG said the Army should have used research, development, test and evaluation funds, not operations and maintenance funds, to develop the video game, and the project also ran afoul of the Anti-Deficiency Act, something we’re sure Wonkette-loving Marines in Iraq discuss frequently between video games.

The DOD IG report is so wonkish, in fact, that we won’t bore you with the details, but if you want to know more, you can find it on the Web at

A hundred billion here…
The Interceptor is grateful to Rep. Ellen Tauscher (D-Calif.) for totaling DOD’s emergency supplemental funding. That number is a staggering $407.4 billion from the beginning of combat operations in Afghanistan in 2001 through the Bush administration’s latest request for emergency DOD funding.

In a letter to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Tauscher said DOD has “increasingly been using supplemental funding for items and programs that are either not emergency items or whose cost is expected, predictable and should therefore be funded and authorized in the regular budget.”

We applaud Tauscher’s attempt to impose fiscal restraint on DOD, but Congress also needs to exercise it and stop using earmarks in regular and emergency bills to “gorge itself on pork,” in the words of Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.). Those earmarks include $2 million in DOD’s fiscal 2006 spending bill to counter brown tree snakes, which are slowly eating most living things in Guam, including household pets.

A couple of us here at Federal Computer Week have fond memories of Guam but agree with McCain that the brown tree snake has no business slithering its way into DOD’s budget.

Intercept something? Send it tobbrewin@

The Fed 100

Read the profiles of all this year's winners.


  • Then-presidential candidate Donald Trump at a 2016 campaign event. Image: Shutterstock

    'Buy American' order puts procurement in the spotlight

    Some IT contractors are worried that the "buy American" executive order from President Trump could squeeze key innovators out of the market.

  • OMB chief Mick Mulvaney, shown here in as a member of Congress in 2013. (Photo credit Gage Skidmore/Flickr)

    White House taps old policies for new government makeover

    New guidance from OMB advises agencies to use shared services, GWACs and federal schedules for acquisition, and to leverage IT wherever possible in restructuring plans.

  • Shutterstock image (by Everett Historical): aerial of the Pentagon.

    What DOD's next CIO will have to deal with

    It could be months before the Defense Department has a new CIO, and he or she will face a host of organizational and operational challenges from Day One

  • USAF Gen. John Hyten

    General: Cyber Command needs new platform before NSA split

    U.S. Cyber Command should be elevated to a full combatant command as soon as possible, the head of Strategic Command told Congress, but it cannot be separated from the NSA until it has its own cyber platform.

  • Image from Shutterstock.

    DLA goes virtual

    The Defense Logistics Agency is in the midst of an ambitious campaign to eliminate its IT infrastructure and transition to using exclusively shared, hosted and virtual services.

  • Fed 100 logo

    The 2017 Federal 100

    The women and men who make up this year's Fed 100 are proof positive of what one person can make possibile in federal IT. Read on to learn more about each and every winner's accomplishments.

Reader comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group