Roadblocks hamper emergency response system coordination

Compatible communications at state level affected by federal funding, lack of standards

When terrorists crashed an airplane into the Pentagon in 2001, they exposed a fundamental flaw in the District of Columbia’s capacity for dealing with disaster: Police officers and firefighters were unable to talk to one another via radio or mount a coordinated response to the panic that beset Washington, D.C., when thousands thought more hijacked planes were heading for targets in the city. Put to the test, the emergency response system failed.

Five years later, emergency preparedness at the federal, state and local levels continues to lurch toward seamless information exchange — the backbone of coordinated emergency response.

“It’s hard,” said Robert LeGrande, the District of Columbia’s deputy chief technology officer. “Very difficult and very costly.”

Achieving interoperable communications — a Holy Grail of sorts for first responders — is easier said than done.

That was the consensus of information technology experts who met earlier this month in Washington, D.C., for the National Association of State Chief Information Officers’ midyear conference. Participants in a panel discussion said progress has been slow and erratic.

The discussion was titled “Our Next Emergency Is Here — Any Progress on Communications Interoperability?”

The uncoordinated deployment of emergency communications systems undermines the goal of interoperability, IT experts say.

Money pouring into local jurisdictions from the Homeland Security Department is fueling the problem, they say, by allowing localities to purchase communications systems without regard for common technical standards.

About 80 percent of those federal funds go directly to local governments, subverting states’ authority to impose technical standards.

“There is great technology out there, but the absence of a national, voluntarily chosen standard of interoperability is a major roadblock,” said a senior DHS staff member who spoke on condition of anonymity. “What good is a system unless you have buy-in from key jurisdictions?”

Localities often must choose between function and cost. If a municipal government can buy radios adequate for local use for $800 each or radios compatible with a statewide system for double the cost, the cheaper option often gets the nod, said Phil Bates, IT director of Utah’s Department of Public Safety.

Utah’s emergency response system is more advanced than most other states’. In anticipation of the 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City, the state created the Utah Communications Agency Network, a quasigovernmental agency that strengthened the state’s interoperable communications.

The organization deployed a Motorola radio system that boosted the efficiency of limited frequencies to serve an eight-county area. During the Olympics, the system supported federal law enforcement agents, whose temporary communications system failed.

Utah was successful in using state funds to entice localities to adopt compatible communications systems even before the 2001 terrorist attacks and the ensuing gush of federal funds. Every dispatch center in the state now connects to a wireless integrated network.

Having succeeded at home, Utah is racing to promote interoperability standards with its neighbors: Arizona, Colorado and New Mexico. The Federal Communications Commission’s allocation of broadband spectrum to public safety organizations has created the potential for a technology stampede by localities eager to transmit real-time video to local command centers, Bates said.

“If we don’t get on top of this, we’ll have a bunch of disparate networks out there,” he said. In the District of Columbia, the 2001 attacks created an urgency that hadn’t existed before. The city invested in a fiber-optic communications network that became active two years ago and deployed mobile repeaters to extend radio coverage to the city’s dead spots, including the interiors of massive federal office buildings that impede signals. The district has also deployed a wireless accelerated responder network, and it has agreed with Virginia and Maryland on interoperability communications network standards.

Despite the progress, proposed cuts by federal lawmakers to the district’s technology budget imperil the overhaul of the city’s communications systems.

“We hold out hope that we can finish this,” LeGrande said.

Pulley is a freelance writer based in Arlington, Va.

Click here to enlarge the chart (.pdf).



The Fed 100

Read the profiles of all this year's winners.


  • Then-presidential candidate Donald Trump at a 2016 campaign event. Image: Shutterstock

    'Buy American' order puts procurement in the spotlight

    Some IT contractors are worried that the "buy American" executive order from President Trump could squeeze key innovators out of the market.

  • OMB chief Mick Mulvaney, shown here in as a member of Congress in 2013. (Photo credit Gage Skidmore/Flickr)

    White House taps old policies for new government makeover

    New guidance from OMB advises agencies to use shared services, GWACs and federal schedules for acquisition, and to leverage IT wherever possible in restructuring plans.

  • Shutterstock image (by Everett Historical): aerial of the Pentagon.

    What DOD's next CIO will have to deal with

    It could be months before the Defense Department has a new CIO, and he or she will face a host of organizational and operational challenges from Day One

  • USAF Gen. John Hyten

    General: Cyber Command needs new platform before NSA split

    U.S. Cyber Command should be elevated to a full combatant command as soon as possible, the head of Strategic Command told Congress, but it cannot be separated from the NSA until it has its own cyber platform.

  • Image from Shutterstock.

    DLA goes virtual

    The Defense Logistics Agency is in the midst of an ambitious campaign to eliminate its IT infrastructure and transition to using exclusively shared, hosted and virtual services.

  • Fed 100 logo

    The 2017 Federal 100

    The women and men who make up this year's Fed 100 are proof positive of what one person can make possibile in federal IT. Read on to learn more about each and every winner's accomplishments.

Reader comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group