GAO: Feds still lack security research agenda

The federal government does a lot of research and development work in information security, but its efforts still lack a coherent focus, according to a Government Accountability Office report.

The primary problem is that the government has not developed an overarching R&D agenda, the report states. Numerous agencies are actively researching security issues, but they are not coordinating their work. Those agencies also need to do a better job of sharing information about their research with one another and with industry, according to GAO.

"Until these issues are addressed, federal research for cybersecurity and information assurance may not keep pace with the increasing number of threats and vulnerabilities," GAO auditors wrote in the cover letter to their report, provided to Rep. Tom Davis (R-Va.), chairman of the House Government Reform Committee.

The idea of a research agenda stems from the National Strategy to Secure Cyberspace, published in 2003. According to that report, the federal government should develop a road map for addressing identified gaps in security research.

The 2003 report recommends looking at research requirements in three segments: near term (one to three years), midterm (three to five years) and long term (five years or more). GAO auditors are not so concerned about near-term efforts. But the lack of an agenda "increase[s] the risk that mid- and longer-term research priorities may not be achieved," the GAO report states.

GAO says agencies have made some progress in recent years. For example, they created an interagency working group to focus on security research and published a federal plan for guiding their research.

But that plan falls short of being the comprehensive agenda the government requires, auditors concluded. The agenda should outline specific milestones for conducting research, specify goals and measures for evaluating that work, and assign responsibilities for carrying it out.

GAO recommends that the director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy establish a timeline for developing such an agenda.


  • Comment
    Pilot Class. The author and Barbie Flowers are first row third and second from right, respectively.

    How VA is disrupting tech delivery

    A former Digital Service specialist at the Department of Veterans Affairs explains efforts to transition government from a legacy "project" approach to a more user-centered "product" method.

  • Cloud
    cloud migration

    DHS cloud push comes with complications

    A pressing data center closure schedule and an ensuing scramble to move applications means that some Homeland Security components might need more than one hop to get to the cloud.

  • Comment
    Blue Signage and logo of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

    Doing digital differently at VA

    The Department of Veterans Affairs CIO explains why digital transformation is not optional.

Stay Connected


Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.