DOD modernization yields to war demands

Satellite development is one of the few long-term programs to be well-funded

The Defense Department issued three budget requests last week totaling $716.5 billion to run the department and fight ongoing wars through 2008. Meanwhile, funds for some information technology programs have become so tight that DOD is paying contractors in two-month increments rather than annually.

DOD requested $481.4 billion for its fiscal 2008 base budget, an 11 percent increase compared with its 2007 budget request. The Bush administration pegged the cost of war operations in 2008 at $141.7 billion. It requested an additional $93.7 billion in emergency supplemental funding for the rest of fiscal 2007.

Those budget requests, if honored, would bring DOD spending to its highest level since World War II, but transformation and future programs could still be at risk, experts say. 

“It is doubtful whether, even with these large increases, DOD will be able to fully implement its very costly long-term modernization and force structure plans,” said Steven Kosiak, director of budget studies at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments.

With few exceptions, DOD’s IT funding priorities are for near-term, deployable systems rather than long-term modernization programs. For example, DOD would increase spending on the Joint Network Node-Network (JNN-N), the system of stationary satellite uplink vehicles that have been deployed throughout Iraq and Afghanistan to provide bandwidth and connectivity on the battlefield.

DOD eventually plans to use the Warfighter Information Network-Tactical system, which will facilitate mobile connectivity. WIN-T is an integral part of the Future Combat Systems (FCS) infrastructure, but it won’t be ready for deployment for several more years.

There is a healthy debate about JNN-N, which has been deployed in the near term and has a static configuration, and WIN-T, which is the mobile network capability of the future, said Nelson Ford, Army assistant secretary for financial management and comptroller. The Army is searching for the right time to stop buying for JNN-N and start procuring for WIN-T, he added.

Spending on the Army’s FCS will be pared back $3.3 billion from $30 billion in the next five years. FCS will claim $3.6 billion of the Army’s research and development budget in 2008 and drop to $3.2 billion in 2009 as the program shifts toward the procurement phase, Army budget officials said.

Programs that support the war effort are getting funded, but future modernization programs are being pushed back, said Kevin Carroll, who leads the Army’s Program Executive Office for Enterprise Information Systems. Some large PEO-EIS activities, including the Single Army Logistics Enterprise (SALE) program, had their funding cut in the base budget but raised in the war budgets.
Technology programs are now divided between those that serve Southwest Asia and others that are concentrated in the continental United States, Carroll said. Money shifted to war operations is never returned, he said, which means delays for longer-term modernization programs.

When programs are realigned, acquisitions are broken into smaller pieces, and that creates inefficiencies, Carroll said. PEO-EIS had to realign SALE and push back the schedules for several IT initiatives, including the Installation Information Infrastructure Modernization Program, the Global Combat Support System-Army and the General Fund Enterprise Business System.

“That’s all being driven not because it’s a smart thing technically but because of funding,” Carroll said. Funding constraints have forced PEO-EIS to pay contractors in two-month increments rather than annually, he added.

Few defenders

DOD is split over whether to invest in rapidly deployable solutions or longer-term programs, said Pierre Chao, director of the Defense Industrial Initiatives program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Each spending approach has its advantages, he said.

Although procurement budgets are rising, many development programs are reaching the procurement stage, so the budget pressures will increase, Chao said.

“They’re finding out that they’re trying to fit 20 pounds of programs into a 10-pound bag,” he said.

IT and network-centric warfare programs tend to fall through the cracks because they don’t have constituencies inside the military services to fight for them, Chao said.

Everybody agrees that spending for those programs is important, he added, “but it’s hard to find strong institutional actors to defend that.”

A few windfalls
Satellite and space programs were exceptions to the general clampdown on funding long-term system development programs.

The Transformational Communications Satellite  System, Space-Based Infrared System-High, and the next-generation Navigation Satellite Timing And Ranging Global Positioning System system all received windfalls, raising proposed space program spending $1.2 billion to $6 billion in fiscal 2008.
The new Congress weighs inDemocratic congressional leaders responded swiftly to the Pentagon’s $716.5 billion budget request by promising increased scrutiny and oversight.

“The sums involved in the defense budget requests are staggering,” said House Armed Services Committee Chairman Ike Skelton (D-Mo.) “We cannot provide an adequate national defense on the cheap, but neither can we afford to simply ratify the president’s request without performing the due diligence and oversight our Constitution requires.”

Skelton also said war needs are affecting long-term modernization.
“Congress must look very carefully at how much of this increase truly goes to enhancing our readiness and future defense capabilities and how much is being spent to further the fight in Iraq,” he said.

— Josh Rogin


  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

  • Comment
    Pilot Class. The author and Barbie Flowers are first row third and second from right, respectively.

    How VA is disrupting tech delivery

    A former Digital Service specialist at the Department of Veterans Affairs explains efforts to transition government from a legacy "project" approach to a more user-centered "product" method.

  • Cloud
    cloud migration

    DHS cloud push comes with complications

    A pressing data center closure schedule and an ensuing scramble to move applications means that some Homeland Security components might need more than one hop to get to the cloud.

Stay Connected


Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.