FlipSide

How we survived Y2K

No one in the federal information technology community who survived the millennium rollover will ever forget the work, the anxiety and the dollars spent to alter or replace millions of lines of programming code so computers would recognize Jan. 1, 2000. We asked Jim Flyzik, former Treasury Department chief information officer who is now president of the Flyzik Group, if the massive effort to make computers safe for the new century was unnecessary, in light of the relatively problem-free rollover reported in Federal Computer Week and elsewhere. Or was it because of all that work, anxiety and money spent that we avoided a computational doomsday?

 “We went into the project, and the objective was to have nothing happen,” he said. “So it’s somewhat ironic that when nothing happened, it was seen as all hype. In my mind, it was an example of the government mobilizing around a project and getting all the work done that needed to be done.

“I do believe that in the case of Treasury, in particular the Internal Revenue Service and many of our other bureaus, that had we not put in all that time and effort and work, we would have had major, major problems,” he added.  “There’s no doubt in my mind that we accomplished a great deal, and that we succeeded in achieving the objective of nothing happening.”

From the Jan. 10, 2000, issue of  Federal Computer Week

Y2K mayhem? Just ho-hum

The biggest Year 2000 problem for the federal government may have been getting stuck at work during the celebrations. As computer systems functioned through Zulu time, midnight Eastern Time and the good times, millennium bug watchers may have felt a bit let down. Simple repairs and some red faces followed a series of minor glitches. For example:

  • A few alarm systems and computerized locks failed, but they were fixed in short order.
  • A power plant in Wisconsin shut down briefly.
  • The Energy Department’s headquarters could not receive updates from a system at one of its national labs.
  • A backup system at a regional Federal Aviation Administration site failed but also was fixed quickly and posed no significant threat to safety.
  • A software glitch at the Department of Veterans Affairs was discovered that could have resulted in VA invoices being dated 1900 instead of 2000.
  • A Justice Department switch that relays information from FBI crime information databases to other agencies relayed information just fine but dated it as 01/01/100.
  • Perhaps most amusing of all, the World Wide Web page for the Naval Research Laboratory’s Director of Time proclaimed briefly that we had arrived at the Year 19000100.

Not all problems were trivial, however. One of the more serious failures crippled the software used to process firearms licenses at the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. The ATF halted its licensing operations for five days.

Another significant Year 2000 failure popped up in one of the Defense Department’s satellite-based intelligence systems. Although DOD announced that the system was down for two hours during the date change, the event remains a tightly guarded secret. There are other failures in DOD that remain classified, according to a DOD source, adding to the argument that we may never fully know the extent to which DOD operations were affected.

Overall, so little happened that agencies might find it difficult to convince the IT rank and file that the next big challenge — security — is a challenge at all. “We cried wolf and then apparently nothing happened,” said John Pike, a defense analyst for the Federation of American Scientists. “Not even a stoplight conked out.”
Ringing up the new yearHere’s the total amount government and industry spent on preparing the world’s computer systems for the Year 2000:

World total: $500 billion
U.S. total: $100 billion
Federal share: $8.5 billion
Source: Commerce Department

The Fed 100

Save the date for 28th annual Federal 100 Awards Gala.

Featured

  • computer network

    How Einstein changes the way government does business

    The Department of Commerce is revising its confidentiality agreement for statistical data survey respondents to reflect the fact that the Department of Homeland Security could see some of that data if it is captured by the Einstein system.

  • Defense Secretary Jim Mattis. Army photo by Monica King. Jan. 26, 2017.

    Mattis mulls consolidation in IT, cyber

    In a Feb. 17 memo, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis told senior leadership to establish teams to look for duplication across the armed services in business operations, including in IT and cybersecurity.

  • Image from Shutterstock.com

    DHS vague on rules for election aid, say states

    State election officials had more questions than answers after a Department of Homeland Security presentation on the designation of election systems as critical U.S. infrastructure.

  • Org Chart Stock Art - Shutterstock

    How the hiring freeze targets millennials

    The government desperately needs younger talent to replace an aging workforce, and experts say that a freeze on hiring doesn't help.

  • Shutterstock image: healthcare digital interface.

    VA moves ahead with homegrown scheduling IT

    The Department of Veterans Affairs will test an internally developed scheduling module at primary care sites nationwide to see if it's ready to service the entire agency.

  • Shutterstock images (honglouwawa & 0beron): Bitcoin image overlay replaced with a dollar sign on a hardware circuit.

    MGT Act poised for a comeback

    After missing in the last Congress, drafters of a bill to encourage cloud adoption are looking for a new plan.

Reader comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group