Should the GS system be scrapped or not?

I'm confused. In the title of your editorial, "Time for a fresh start," you wrote that few people think the General Schedule pay system works well, but then in the first paragraph you say, "Increasingly few people believe that the federal government's existing pay system isn't broken…" and follow that up in the second paragraph with, "One-third of agency chief human capital officers said the government should scrap the government's General Schedule pay system…" Does one-third of a group equate to a majority? I'm not sure how what you stated in your first two paragraphs can lead to what you state in the title. Your logic seems to be skewed. Did I miss something?

Rob Lowe, Civilian
Rivet Mile Lead Engineer
Minot Air Force Base, N.D.

Featured

  • Contracting
    8 prototypes of the border walls as tweeted by CBP San Diego

    DHS contractors face protests – on the streets

    Tech companies are facing protests internally from workers and externally from activists about doing for government amid controversial policies like "zero tolerance" for illegal immigration.

  • Workforce
    By Mark Van Scyoc Royalty-free stock photo ID: 285175268

    At OPM, Weichert pushes direct hire, pay agent changes

    Margaret Weichert, now acting director of the Office of Personnel Management, is clearing agencies to make direct hires in IT, cyber and other tech fields and is changing pay for specialized occupations.

  • Cloud
    Shutterstock ID ID: 222190471 By wk1003mike

    IBM protests JEDI cloud deal

    As the deadline to submit bids on the Pentagon's $10 billion, 10-year warfighter cloud deal draws near, IBM announced a legal protest.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.