Letter: RFID technology unsecured, waste of money

Regarding “Buzz of the Week: HSPD-12 fears,” it's not just background checks that are of concern. Even after background checks are conducted, people will carry on their badges something called radio frequency identification (RFID). There is no good reason to have this technology on the badges. It is only good for two things: allowing the wearer to slip through quickly (unseen), as with transit passes, and to track the movements of things (the technology originated from spying applications). Furthermore, an RFID badge is not secure from reading by a remote, unauthorized (or, these days, warrantless authorized) entity. A National Institute of Standards and Technology specification requires this technology on the badges, with no reason given as to why. It does not support providing secure identification of a person for federal building access. All it achieves is the possibility for privacy violation by tracking people’s movement, makes the badge owner vulnerable to loss of personal information to unknown observers, and allows insecure access to buildings if it's going to also be used as a transit pass.

If anyone says RFID has too short a range to spy on people, then consider that NASA's goal is to put readers on every single computer, which would make a network. To further engender mistrust, security personnel who came to brief employees at one NASA center brought along a bunch of silent observers and one man who would only vaguely answer questions about RFID, saying that it would be "turned off." If it's not going to be used, then why waste all that taxpayer money on these horribly expensive badges?


This is one NASA employee who is furious at this waste of money. Why don't they throw that money at reining in Blackwater? Since when does a terrorist give a damn about NASA or the National Institutes of Health? Put the money where the actual security risk is, for goodness' sake.


Anonymous
NASA


What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to letters@fcw.com (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.

Featured

  • Cybersecurity

    DHS floats 'collective defense' model for cybersecurity

    Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wants her department to have a more direct role in defending the private sector and critical infrastructure entities from cyberthreats.

  • Defense
    Defense Secretary James Mattis testifies at an April 12 hearing of the House Armed Services Committee.

    Mattis: Cloud deal not tailored for Amazon

    On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to quell "rumors" that the Pentagon's planned single-award cloud acquisition was designed with Amazon Web Services in mind.

  • Census
    shutterstock image

    2020 Census to include citizenship question

    The Department of Commerce is breaking with recent practice and restoring a question about respondent citizenship last used in 1950, despite being urged not to by former Census directors and outside experts.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.