IG: DHS wrongly awarded contract to Alaska Native firm

An agency of the Homeland Security Department improperly awarded a 10-year, $475 million sole-source contract in 2003 to the Alaska Native firm Chenega Technology Services, according to a new report from the department’s inspector general.

The Customs and Border Protection contract with Chenega is for maintenance, repair and operation of metal detectors, X-ray screening devices and other inspection and screening equipment at border checkpoints, airports and seaports, IG Richard Skinner explained. As of February, the department had spent $141 million on the contract.

CBP classified Chenega under the industry classification code for wired telecommunications carriers, the IG wrote in the 30-page report. However, the provision of wired telecommunications was not included in the statement of objectives for the contract, he said.

“CBP did not comply with federal regulations when it awarded Chenega the contract under an incorrect industry classification code,” the IG wrote. “Had CBP used the correct classification, Chenega would have been ineligible for the sole-source award.”

According to the report, a CBP contracting officer and project officer agreed with the IG that the classification was “inappropriate.” CBP officials also noted that the Small Business Administration had signed off on the classification used for Chenega. However, agency officials agreed with Skinner’s recommendations to further evaluate the contract and the agency’s contracting practices.

DHS had sought to consolidate about 20 existing contracts into a single maintenance contract and to put it up for competitive bidding. However, CBP officials were persuaded by Chenega’s “self-marketing” to make it a sole-source 8(a) Business Development Program, Alaska Native corporation contract, the report said.

CBP bent the rules because it was under a tight deadline and because it wanted to meet its small-business objectives for 2003, Skinner said.

SBA must approve participation in the 8(a) program. Alaska Native corporations receive additional benefits, including subsidies and exemptions from various federal contract limits. The favored status for Alaskan Native corporations has been controversial but has been promoted by Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), former chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee.

Under the incorrect designation used by CBP, Chenega qualified for the sole-source contract, Skinner wrote. But the company would not have been eligible if it had been properly classified because the firm’s revenues would have exceeded the limits, the report stated.

Also, the agency did not monitor Chenega effectively with respect to the company’s compliance with subcontracting regulations, the IG said. Chenega did not respond to a request for comment in time for this story.

Chenega Technology Services of Alexandria, Va., is a unit of Chenega Corp. of Anchorage, Alaska. Chenega Corp. ranks No. 2 on Washington Technology’s 2007 Top 25 8(a) firms list.

Alice Lipowicz writes for Washington Technology, an 1105 Government Information Group publication.

About the Author

Alice Lipowicz is a staff writer covering government 2.0, homeland security and other IT policies for Federal Computer Week.

Featured

  • Cybersecurity

    DHS floats 'collective defense' model for cybersecurity

    Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wants her department to have a more direct role in defending the private sector and critical infrastructure entities from cyberthreats.

  • Defense
    Defense Secretary James Mattis testifies at an April 12 hearing of the House Armed Services Committee.

    Mattis: Cloud deal not tailored for Amazon

    On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to quell "rumors" that the Pentagon's planned single-award cloud acquisition was designed with Amazon Web Services in mind.

  • Census
    shutterstock image

    2020 Census to include citizenship question

    The Department of Commerce is breaking with recent practice and restoring a question about respondent citizenship last used in 1950, despite being urged not to by former Census directors and outside experts.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.