Petrillo: A memo to Waxman

As you consider changes to the procurement process, a good place to start is the final report of the Acquisition Advisory Panel. Most of the following ideas track the panel’s recommendations. The best opportunities for improvement are for interagency and multi-agency contracts, so I’ll start with changes to limit abuse there.

■ The easiest change is to apply to civilian agencies the same ordering rules Congress mandated for the Defense Department. The Section 803 rules require notification of all awardees of order opportunities or else ensuring the submission of at least three proposals. Apply those rules governmentwide.

■ As the panel suggested, mandate more robust competition requirements for orders worth more than $5 million, such as a clear statement of requirements, evaluation criteria and documented award decisions. And drop the limitation on protests for such orders. A deal of this size shouldn’t be immune from accountability just because it’s called an order.

■ Because multiple-award contracts with a limited number of awardees act as a prequalification of bidders, apply the same type of restrictions applied to other prequalification programs, such as those in Section 253c of Title 41.

■ Consider trimming the number of interagency contracts.Make the Office of Management and Budget select a few best-of-breed vehicles. If an agency wants to start a new program or continue an old one, make it show that the added benefits will outweigh the costs.

■ Expand the use of government-purpose license rights, especially for items with a potential commercial application. Current data rights clauses often give the government unlimited rights. That discourages contractor investment in technology and gives the government more rights than it needs or uses.

■ Resist the temptation to have Congress mandate specific criteria for agencies to use to evaluate proposals. For instance, repeal the restrictions on the blanket use of numeric weights.

■ Consider discouraging awarding contracts without having discussions with offerors. The time and effort spent in negotiations often results in better contracts.

■ Put contractors on a level playing field with the government when it comes to legal presumptions.

■ Make sure, as the panel suggested, that there is clear guidance on which jobs are appropriate for outsourcing and which are not, whether or not there is a formal A-76 process for competitive sourcing.

■ Require agencies to list on their Web sites the names of all contracting officers and any limitations on their authority. Company officials get nervous when they aren’t sure if they are dealing with the right person.

■ And last but not least, don’t forget to fund enough positions for contracting officers and support employees. Numbers alone aren’t enough. It is just as important to support vigorous and constant training for acquisition employees.

Petrillo is a lawyer at Washington law firm Petrillo and Powell. He can be reached at jp@petrillopowell.com.   

Featured

  • Contracting
    8 prototypes of the border walls as tweeted by CBP San Diego

    DHS contractors face protests – on the streets

    Tech companies are facing protests internally from workers and externally from activists about doing for government amid controversial policies like "zero tolerance" for illegal immigration.

  • Workforce
    By Mark Van Scyoc Royalty-free stock photo ID: 285175268

    At OPM, Weichert pushes direct hire, pay agent changes

    Margaret Weichert, now acting director of the Office of Personnel Management, is clearing agencies to make direct hires in IT, cyber and other tech fields and is changing pay for specialized occupations.

  • Cloud
    Shutterstock ID ID: 222190471 By wk1003mike

    IBM protests JEDI cloud deal

    As the deadline to submit bids on the Pentagon's $10 billion, 10-year warfighter cloud deal draws near, IBM announced a legal protest.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.