Letter: Brand name justifications must hold water

Regarding "OFPP: Watch use of brand names in proposals," When a field office orders equipment, they are being told to do so by the enterprise level office.


In order to speed the delivery, the enterprise level [office] must include as part of their documentation why there can be no deviation from the brand names of the equipment specified. 


When a systems technician justifies the selection of a brand name with "That is the only one I know," it just doesn't meet the criteria for justification.


All enterprise level offices should have a written justification, cleared by their legal [department], that can be included in any solicitation as a cut-and-paste. Almost all the equipment that is brand name costs more than $25K installed so this would be a worthwhile exercise.


Rudi Birzin
GSA FAS


****


What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to letters@fcw.com (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.

Featured

  • FCW PERSPECTIVES
    sensor network (agsandrew/Shutterstock.com)

    Are agencies really ready for EIS?

    The telecom contract has the potential to reinvent IT infrastructure, but finding the bandwidth to take full advantage could prove difficult.

  • People
    Dave Powner, GAO

    Dave Powner audits the state of federal IT

    The GAO director of information technology issues is leaving government after 16 years. On his way out the door, Dave Powner details how far govtech has come in the past two decades and flags the most critical issues he sees facing federal IT leaders.

  • FCW Illustration.  Original Images: Shutterstock, Airbnb

    Should federal contracting be more like Airbnb?

    Steve Kelman believes a lighter touch and a bit more trust could transform today's compliance culture.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.