Letter: Brand name justifications must hold water

Regarding "OFPP: Watch use of brand names in proposals," When a field office orders equipment, they are being told to do so by the enterprise level office.


In order to speed the delivery, the enterprise level [office] must include as part of their documentation why there can be no deviation from the brand names of the equipment specified. 


When a systems technician justifies the selection of a brand name with "That is the only one I know," it just doesn't meet the criteria for justification.


All enterprise level offices should have a written justification, cleared by their legal [department], that can be included in any solicitation as a cut-and-paste. Almost all the equipment that is brand name costs more than $25K installed so this would be a worthwhile exercise.


Rudi Birzin
GSA FAS


****


What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to [email protected] (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.

Featured

  • Elections
    voting security

    'Unprecedented' challenges to safe, secure 2020 vote

    Our election infrastructure is bending under the stress of multiple crises. Administrators say they are doing all they can to ensure it doesn't break.

  • FCW Perspectives
    zero trust network

    Can government get to zero trust?

    Today's hybrid infrastructures and highly mobile workforces need the protection zero trust security can provide. Too bad there are obstacles at almost every turn.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.