Letter: Using GSA is not a waste of money

Regarding “Army: Bolstering acquisition workforce could take 10 years,” does every agency need its own contracting force? I suppose they need their own systems and contracts, too. How unbelievably bureaucratic! Well, at least the Army is looking at reality. Forget how much time it would take. How much will that cost? Is it even doable? Why did the Army  -- and other services and the Homeland Security Department -- inaugurate new indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contracts if it can't support them and they duplicate what the General Services Administration already does? Should it be a goal to build your own fiefdom? And using GSA is a waste of money? Hmmmmn. I don't think so. The feds earn more disrespect every day. I think it's time to look at getting the Defense Department out of the routine acquisition business and consolidate resources under GSA. Why not?

Anonymous


What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to [email protected] (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.


Featured

  • Cybersecurity
    cybersecurity (Rawpixel/Shutterstock.com)

    CMMC clears key regulatory hurdle

    The White House approved an interim rule to mandate defense contractors prove they adhere to existing cybersecurity standards from the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

  • Budget
    Stock photo ID: 134176955 By Richard Cavalleri

    House passes stopgap spending bill

    The current appropriations bills are set to expire on Oct. 1; the bill now goes to the Senate where it is expected to pass.

Stay Connected