Letter: Using GSA is not a waste of money

Regarding “Army: Bolstering acquisition workforce could take 10 years,” does every agency need its own contracting force? I suppose they need their own systems and contracts, too. How unbelievably bureaucratic! Well, at least the Army is looking at reality. Forget how much time it would take. How much will that cost? Is it even doable? Why did the Army  -- and other services and the Homeland Security Department -- inaugurate new indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contracts if it can't support them and they duplicate what the General Services Administration already does? Should it be a goal to build your own fiefdom? And using GSA is a waste of money? Hmmmmn. I don't think so. The feds earn more disrespect every day. I think it's time to look at getting the Defense Department out of the routine acquisition business and consolidate resources under GSA. Why not?

Anonymous


What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to letters@fcw.com (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.


Featured

  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

  • Comment
    Pilot Class. The author and Barbie Flowers are first row third and second from right, respectively.

    How VA is disrupting tech delivery

    A former Digital Service specialist at the Department of Veterans Affairs explains efforts to transition government from a legacy "project" approach to a more user-centered "product" method.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.