Letter: Who really benefits from NSPS?

Regarding “DOD implements pay changes in NSPS”: This is rather confusing. We were pitched this "work for pay" system and told how it would reward harder workers and how much more efficient and effective it would be. Now we are not rewarded as "promised" and may break the system up and only use it for a minority of the federal employees.

Isn’t it going to be more difficult and less cost-effective to manage two separate evaluation and pay systems? So exactly who is benefiting from this? That is the question that I want honestly answered.

A good idea has been converted into an absolute nightmare of confusion, deceit, greed and waste!

J. Shaver


What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to letters@fcw.com (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.

Featured

  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

  • Comment
    Pilot Class. The author and Barbie Flowers are first row third and second from right, respectively.

    How VA is disrupting tech delivery

    A former Digital Service specialist at the Department of Veterans Affairs explains efforts to transition government from a legacy "project" approach to a more user-centered "product" method.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.