Letter: Canceling earmarks in committee reports not effective

Regarding the article, Bush to order agencies to ignore some earmarks, one reader writes: In addition to stopping the earmark authorizations list in committee reports require also that the accompanying appropriations be rescinded also.

Otherwise, to cancel the earmarks without canceling the appropriations for the earmarks will result in appropriations to which there will be no projects authorized for expenditure.

However, Congress can easily counter these earmark cancellations by just listing the earmarks within the appropriation bills or authorization bills.

So, nothing has been accomplished by the President's Executive Order to cancel earmarks in committee reports.


Anonymous


What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to [email protected] (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.

Featured

  • Oversight
    President of the United States of America, Donald J. Trump, attends the 2019 Army Navy Game in Philadelphia, Pa., Dec. 14, 2019. (U.S. Army photo by Sgt. Dana Clarke)

    Trump shakes up official watchdog ranks

    The White House removed an official designated to provide oversight to the $2 trillion rescue and relief fund and nominated a raft of new appointees to handle oversight chores at multiple agencies.

  • Workforce
    coronavirus molecule (creativeneko/Shutterstock.com)

    OMB urges 'maximum telework flexibilities' for DC-area feds

    A Sunday evening memo ahead of a potentially chaotic commute urges agency heads to pivot to telework as much as possible.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.