Letter: Canceling earmarks in committee reports not effective

Regarding the article, Bush to order agencies to ignore some earmarks, one reader writes: In addition to stopping the earmark authorizations list in committee reports require also that the accompanying appropriations be rescinded also.

Otherwise, to cancel the earmarks without canceling the appropriations for the earmarks will result in appropriations to which there will be no projects authorized for expenditure.

However, Congress can easily counter these earmark cancellations by just listing the earmarks within the appropriation bills or authorization bills.

So, nothing has been accomplished by the President's Executive Order to cancel earmarks in committee reports.


Anonymous


What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to letters@fcw.com (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.

Featured

  • Cybersecurity

    DHS floats 'collective defense' model for cybersecurity

    Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wants her department to have a more direct role in defending the private sector and critical infrastructure entities from cyberthreats.

  • Defense
    Defense Secretary James Mattis testifies at an April 12 hearing of the House Armed Services Committee.

    Mattis: Cloud deal not tailored for Amazon

    On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to quell "rumors" that the Pentagon's planned single-award cloud acquisition was designed with Amazon Web Services in mind.

  • Census
    shutterstock image

    2020 Census to include citizenship question

    The Department of Commerce is breaking with recent practice and restoring a question about respondent citizenship last used in 1950, despite being urged not to by former Census directors and outside experts.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.