Letter: How much are contractors paid to overlook the obvious?

Regarding “SBInet hits software snag”: I find it very disturbing that neither Boeing nor the reams of support contractors could have overlooked the necessary due diligence applied by mature information technology development operations.   

What is also mystifying is the Homeland Security Department’s inability to leverage existing solutions that have already been successfully deployed. $64 million is a lot to pay for something that already exists in the market.

Maybe DHS needs to re-examine its engineering support contractors. They are supposed to prevent these types of problems.  How much are they being paid to overlook the obvious?

Anonymous


What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to letters@fcw.com (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.


Featured

  • FCW PERSPECTIVES
    sensor network (agsandrew/Shutterstock.com)

    Are agencies really ready for EIS?

    The telecom contract has the potential to reinvent IT infrastructure, but finding the bandwidth to take full advantage could prove difficult.

  • People
    Dave Powner, GAO

    Dave Powner audits the state of federal IT

    The GAO director of information technology issues is leaving government after 16 years. On his way out the door, Dave Powner details how far govtech has come in the past two decades and flags the most critical issues he sees facing federal IT leaders.

  • FCW Illustration.  Original Images: Shutterstock, Airbnb

    Should federal contracting be more like Airbnb?

    Steve Kelman believes a lighter touch and a bit more trust could transform today's compliance culture.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.