Letter: Performance pay system needs more funding, restructuring

Regarding "Pay for performance hammered at House hearing," a reader writes: In the Dept. of Defense, execution of pay for performance under the National Security Personnel System (NSPS) has been further marred by the defense secretary's decision to fund bonuses and continuing pay increases out of the annual cost-of-living increase. Cost-of-living increases rarely keep up with inflation anyway, and this only puts Defense employees further behind the eight ball.


Also, we've moved from a system with a two-page evaluation form and an unconstrained employee self-assessment input to a 13-page evaluation form and employee input constrained to about 800 words.


Finally, NSPS is constrained by funds available to award for performance, just like the demonstration projects of previous yearst. This forces supervisors to fit the actual performance and adjective grades of their employees into a "normal distribution model" to not give "too many" high marks. Once again, the system puts the supervisor and employee in an unresolvable conflict. Such systems should be discarded in favor of true goal/bonus-oriented constructs as those used by many industres, or replaced with a straight supervisor/employee opinion survey like we had under the previous civil service arrangement.


Most USCS employees I've met are not "incentivized" or "motivated" by any personnel evaluation system; rather, such systems are viewed as a necessary evil in order to satisfy the misperceptions of upper management and Congress. If government employees needed a satisfactory performance evaluation/career development system in order to do and retain their jobs, there would have been a mass exodus from the government years ago. The more common reasons we stay and work include: sense of duty/national service responsibility, excellent pay/benefit package, feeling of making a difference/contribution to our customers, and liking co-workers and/or work environment.


Anonymous


What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to letters@fcw.com (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.

Featured

  • Cybersecurity

    DHS floats 'collective defense' model for cybersecurity

    Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wants her department to have a more direct role in defending the private sector and critical infrastructure entities from cyberthreats.

  • Defense
    Defense Secretary James Mattis testifies at an April 12 hearing of the House Armed Services Committee.

    Mattis: Cloud deal not tailored for Amazon

    On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to quell "rumors" that the Pentagon's planned single-award cloud acquisition was designed with Amazon Web Services in mind.

  • Census
    shutterstock image

    2020 Census to include citizenship question

    The Department of Commerce is breaking with recent practice and restoring a question about respondent citizenship last used in 1950, despite being urged not to by former Census directors and outside experts.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.