Letter: DNA authentication is best

Regarding “Bush wants a security clearance reform plan by April 30”: What method of authentication is President Bush (or whoever is in charge) planning to use? RFID, retina scan, fingerprint, voice analysis, DNA authentication, what? Or should I say which? Or all of the above? Isn't he trying to get rid of redundancy?

I suggest DNA authentication. RFID can be tampered with, and so can the other methods. But there might be civil liberties issues with a DNA scan. Certain officials like myself and other members of the intelligence community would have to sign a release allowing our DNA to be registered in a DNA bank in a stand-alone secure system like the NSA computers so hackers cannot infiltrate it and compromise our profiles or sensitive data crucial to national security.

I know — I was a black-hat hacker before I became a white-hat hacker for the U.S. government. It's got to be a stand-alone system to protect the government from liability and breach.

Kenneth J. Robinson


What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to [email protected] (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.

Featured

  • Defense
    concept image of radio communication (DARPA)

    What to look for in DOD's coming spectrum strategy

    Interoperability, integration and JADC2 are likely to figure into an updated electromagnetic spectrum strategy expected soon from the Department of Defense.

  • FCW Perspectives
    data funnel (anttoniart/Shutterstock.com)

    Real-world data management

    The pandemic has put new demands on data teams, but old obstacles are still hindering agency efforts.

Stay Connected