Letter: Military should bring development back in-house

Regarding “Navy to focus only on open systems”: This is a nice thought, but unrealistic. There are no open-source or closed-source applications that do exactly what the Navy wants them to do out of the box. The same holds true for the Air Force and Army.

For the applications to work, they must be customized to meet the business needs of the Navy.

Lets take a simple example: databases. The Navy can say we will no longer use Oracle or Microsoft SQL Server databases. Instead, we will only use PostgreSQL, SQLite and MySQL. They are open source and maintained by a large community of developers.

That's great. Say they install the databases on their servers. But wait, they need to have tables generated to hold data. What data? Data from the applications we use? What applications might those be? Our budget and finance applications. You mean the ones that were configured based on Oracle Federal Financials? Yes. Those are tied directly into the Oracle Database and Application Server. Then let’s get an open-source version of Financials. That's a great idea — I'll search SourceForge.net to see if I can find one. (Downloads phpFinancials and installs on existing *nix box.)

OK, sir, here it is. Where is my data? We have to import it. The forms don't look like the old ones. We have to modify them to look the same. I'm not getting the reports I need that compare last year’s budget with this year’s. We’ll need to write one of those. When can you have it done? In about two years. We better hire some contractors to speed things up.

Six years later, we have a proprietary Navy accounting and finance system built on top of outdated open-source software.

It doesn't matter if the Navy, Army or Air Force uses open- or closed-source software, it’s still going to cost the taxpayer an arm and a leg to fund it because no two organizations within these agencies do business the same way. Everyone wants to customize the software to function the way they have been doing business for the last 50 years. Everyone wants to build their own little empire and forgets the true mission of our military.

The military needs to stop hiring contractors and bring the development back in-house.

Anonymous


What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to letters@fcw.com (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.

Featured

  • Cybersecurity

    DHS floats 'collective defense' model for cybersecurity

    Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wants her department to have a more direct role in defending the private sector and critical infrastructure entities from cyberthreats.

  • Defense
    Defense Secretary James Mattis testifies at an April 12 hearing of the House Armed Services Committee.

    Mattis: Cloud deal not tailored for Amazon

    On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to quell "rumors" that the Pentagon's planned single-award cloud acquisition was designed with Amazon Web Services in mind.

  • Census
    shutterstock image

    2020 Census to include citizenship question

    The Department of Commerce is breaking with recent practice and restoring a question about respondent citizenship last used in 1950, despite being urged not to by former Census directors and outside experts.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.