Editorial: GSA's Alliant lessons

By the time this issue of Federal Computer Week hits the streets, the General Services Administration might have announced its strategy for moving forward with its $50 billion Alliant governmentwide acquisition contract. But in addition to immediate decisions about how to resolve a lingering lawsuit, GSA needs to take proactive steps to assure its customers that they can have faith in the government’s contracting organization.

GSA’s reputation has suffered because of the public reprimand Judge Francis Allegra gave the agency in sustaining the protests of eight losing bidders on the Alliant contract. His ruling is critical of how GSA conducted the Alliant procurement.

Although the court determined that GSA made a good-faith effort to distinguish among the bidders, Allegra wrote that “on a variety of planes, the agency’s effort came up well short, resulting in award decisions that were arbitrary, capricious and otherwise contrary to law.” Furthermore, GSA attached “talismanic significance to technical calculations that suffer from false precision” and failed to adequately weigh prices in its review of contractors’ bids.

“Those compounding errors prejudiced the plaintiffs and oblige this court to set aside the awards in question,” Allegra wrote.

Now is the time for GSA to turn adversity into an opportunity for leadership. After all, the issues surrounding assessments and protests are not exclusive to GSA. The Army’s Information Technology Enterprise Solutions- 2 Services contract ran into similar problems.

We believe GSA will — and should — conduct its own assessment to determine whether the judge’s criticisms were valid and, if so, what the agency is doing to ensure that those problems are addressed. We also recommend that GSA take the bold step of presenting its lessons learned in a public forum.

That approach would allow GSA to play a leadership role.

It could create a framework for how such assessments should work — for the benefit of all agencies and vendors. It would also be a bold and significant step toward creating a procurement environment in which people discuss issues and work together to find solutions.

Clearly, there is important work to be done before GSA can start a self-assessment, but it should take advantage of the occasion to turn adversity into opportunity.

Featured

  • Cybersecurity

    DHS floats 'collective defense' model for cybersecurity

    Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wants her department to have a more direct role in defending the private sector and critical infrastructure entities from cyberthreats.

  • Defense
    Defense Secretary James Mattis testifies at an April 12 hearing of the House Armed Services Committee.

    Mattis: Cloud deal not tailored for Amazon

    On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to quell "rumors" that the Pentagon's planned single-award cloud acquisition was designed with Amazon Web Services in mind.

  • Census
    shutterstock image

    2020 Census to include citizenship question

    The Department of Commerce is breaking with recent practice and restoring a question about respondent citizenship last used in 1950, despite being urged not to by former Census directors and outside experts.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.