Senators: DHS needs flexibility in choosing personnel chief

The Senate’s two federal workforce leaders say the Homeland Security Department needs a depoliticized chief human capital officer (CHCO) to see the department through the transition to a new presidential administration next year.

Sens. Daniel Akaka (D-Hawaii), chairman of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee’s Oversight of Government Management Subcommittee, and George Voinovich (R-Ohio), the panel's ranking member, have introduced legislation that would give the DHS secretary the authority to appoint a career executive to the CHCO position. Under current law, the president must appoint the department’s CHCO.

“As DHS prepares for its first transition between administrations, it is imperative that an able and capable workforce remains in place to continue the department’s important mission,” Voinovich said in a press release. “I believe a career-appointed CHCO is central to a smooth transition.”

However, the bill (S. 2816) stops short of mandating a career CHCO at the department, pointing out that other agencies have the ability to choose the candidate — a political or civilian employee — that “best fits into the framework of the agency and its human capital strategy,” Akaka said. “But DHS, by statute, does not have this flexibility. The work of a CHCO is critical to the support of effective government management and strategic workforce planning.”

Given DHS’ critical mission and the fact that the department remains on the Government Accountability Office’s high-risk list, it is important to give DHS the same flexibility as other agencies in designating its CHCO, he added.

Of the 23 agency representatives on the CHCO Council, nearly half — 11 — are career executives.

Featured

  • Workforce
    White House rainbow light shutterstock ID : 1130423963 By zhephotography

    White House rolls out DEIA strategy

    On Tuesday, the Biden administration issued agencies a roadmap to guide their efforts to develop strategic plans for diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility (DEIA), as required under a as required under a June executive order.

  • Defense
    software (whiteMocca/Shutterstock.com)

    Why DOD is so bad at buying software

    The Defense Department wants to acquire emerging technology faster and more efficiently. But will its latest attempts to streamline its processes be enough?

Stay Connected