Editorial: GSA’s good schedule move

Despite its warts, GSA's schedules contracts are the best tool agencies have in accessing a broad and competitive marketplace

We give the General Services Administration credit for creating an advisory panel to evaluate the relevance of the GSA schedule contracts’ price reduction clause.

We have been proponents of GSA schedule contracts because we believe that for many companies, they are an important entry point into the government market. That makes the schedules one of the best places for agency buyers to look for a broad and competitive marketplace of products and services.

But in recent years, the schedule contracts’ growth has slowed and perhaps dwindled in certain sectors. And a greater concern is that some significant vendors have decided the schedule contracts are more hassle than they are worth.

Sun Microsystems is the best known of these companies, but we hear of others that are reassessing the necessity of having a schedule contract.

One of the primary reasons for their dissatisfaction is the infamous price reduction clause. That provision requires companies with GSA schedule contracts to offer the government the best prices the company offers to commercial customers, and the schedule contracts put companies through an arduous process to ensure that the government gets the lowest prices.

A new Multiple Award Schedule Advisory Panel, which GSA announced earlier this month, will evaluate the relevance of the price reduction clause, among other tasks.

We have some concerns about the creation of yet another committee. Too often, such panels produce reports that end up as bookshelf fillers. But we’re also hopeful that there is broad recognition that language in the schedule contracts must be updated.

We continue to believe that agencies are best served when there is a broad and competitive marketplace for government work, and the GSA schedule contracts are the best means for companies to reach that government market. Anything that offers agencies access to a more diverse and competitive marketplace is good for government.

We applaud GSA officials for facing these issues head on, and we look forward to the panel’s findings.


chart

Featured

  • Cybersecurity
    Shutterstock photo id 669226093 By Gorodenkoff

    The disinformation game

    The federal government is poised to bring new tools and strategies to bear in the fight against foreign-backed online disinformation campaigns, but how and when they choose to act could have ramifications on the U.S. political ecosystem.

  • FCW PERSPECTIVES
    sensor network (agsandrew/Shutterstock.com)

    Are agencies really ready for EIS?

    The telecom contract has the potential to reinvent IT infrastructure, but finding the bandwidth to take full advantage could prove difficult.

  • People
    Dave Powner, GAO

    Dave Powner audits the state of federal IT

    The GAO director of information technology issues is leaving government after 16 years. On his way out the door, Dave Powner details how far govtech has come in the past two decades and flags the most critical issues he sees facing federal IT leaders.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.