GSA gives Alliant a second look

New Alliant awards

The General Services Administration expects to make new Alliant contract awards no later than December, said John Johnson, assistant commissioner of GSA’s Office of Integrated Technology Services.

All the companies that bid on the Alliant governmentwide acquisition contract agreed to extend their proposals, which are now more than a year old, as GSA officials re-evaluate the bids in response to a court decision, said Mary Powers-King, GSA’s director of governmentwide acquisition contracts and information technology schedule programs.

GSA has asked companies to provide updated reference information about their past performance on other contracts. Apart from that, the agency will not allow companies to add new information, Powers-King told an industry group last week.

Alliant’s delays are wrenching for GSA and industry, some procurement experts say. However, GSA has other contracts available that can meet agencies’ needs, Johnson said. For example, GSA recently extended the Applications ‘N Support for Widely-diverse End-user Requirements and Millenia GWACs for IT services.

ANSWER will run through June 30, 2009, and Millenia will run through Oct. 31, 2009.

— Matthew Weigelt

The phrase “get it right” might have a new meaning for the General Services Administration, but a judge’s decision has put the necessity of careful contracting documentation back into the spotlight. GSA officials are racing to get the Alliant contract awarded once and for all by the end of the year, following an upheld protest that undid the 2007 award decisions.

GSA officials, feeling pressure from agencies and industry, are determined to award the $50 billion governmentwide acquisition contract soon so agencies can start using it. The contract was thrown into limbo in March after a judge sustained a protest. GSA officials said this week they are taking time to re-examine the Alliant bids to avoid any future hold-ups.

“We are working as fast and as furiously as we can while we maintain the integrity of the program, and dot all of the i’s and cross all of the t’s,” said John Johnson, GSA assistant commissioner at the Federal Acquisition Service’s Office of Integrated Technology Services.

Johnson said GSA will have the contract awarded by December, which would be 17 months after GSA’s initial award.

The agency is reviewing the past performance information for the 62 companies bidding on the Alliant contract after a federal judge ruled in March that GSA failed to evaluate the past performance information consistently. To make sure GSA gets it right across the board, Johnson said, GSA also is re-evaluating the Alliant Small Business contract.

Redoing the evaluation will give credence to GSA’s next round of Alliant awards, agency officials said. There is a strong possibility of another round of protests by losing companies.
“If it is ever challenged, we have 100 percent certainty that there are no alleged flaws — and I use that word purposely,” Johnson said.

GSA officials “want to validate that what we did was right, and we want to be on solid ground as we make our final award decisions,” Johnson said. He suggested subtly that the original Alliant awards were correct, although the judge’s decision leaves GSA with few options other than conducting a full re-evaluation.

Federal Claims Court Judge Francis Allegra disagreed with GSA’s actions in awarding the governmentwide Alliant contract for information technology products and services. In March, he ruled that GSA failed to make consistent and fair evaluations of the 62 companies bidding on Alliant. It will become GSA’s flagship IT contract as older contracts expire.
GSA made some mistakes in ranking bidders’ basic contract plans, Allegra said in the ruling. He also said officials didn’t sufficiently document the price evaluations and the agency’s reasons for selecting the 30 awardees.

However, the most important issue centered on GSA’s past performance evaluations, Johnson said. Allegra ruled that GSA applied past performance evaluations inconsistently.
GSA is redoing its evaluations for Alliant and the companion contract, Alliant Small Business, Johnson said.

However, this time GSA itself will evaluate the bids and past performance records, Johnson said. In making the original determinations, the agency hired an outside firm to contact the references that bidders provided. GSA will reassess the information the bidders originally filed rather than asking for additional data, he said.

GSA will follow the court’s instructions. However, it most likely will arrive at the same award decisions it made earlier, procurement experts say. They predicted that GSA would make few changes in its evaluation.

William Shook, a partner at law firm Kirkpatrick Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis, said “papering the record” is really all that GSA needs to do to re-evaluate the Alliant awards and get Allegra’s approval. Ultimately, the agency wants to satisfy the judge’s requirements, he said.

&am p;am p;ld quo;As long as there’s documentation, that’s often good enough for the courts,” Shook said. To fulfill that goal, GSA would only need to increase the documentation justifying the original award decisions, he said.

“They hold the cards for the next award decisions,” said Shook, a former congressional investigator.
GSA reviewed Alliant on a previous occasion. The agency originally selected 29 awardees. But after reviewing its decisions in 2007, the agency added Stanley and Associates to the contract in December. Norm Lorentz, vice president of the Council for Excellence in Government, said that action shows GSA’s willingness to make changes. But he said he would like to think the initial awards were mostly correct.
Lorentz said it’s most important to award to capable companies that can handle agencies’ work.

Johnson said GSA can’t simply hand out awards to each bidder on the Alliant contract because it would hurt the reliability of GSA’s flagship program. “We’d be throwing in the towel on integrity,” he said. “Fundamentally, there could be some assertion that the awards we made were flawed.”

GSA plans to go through the same review process for its Alliant Small Business contract awards because GSA used essentially the same evaluation template for that contract, Johnson said. There are 62 companies on the small-business contract.

About the Author

Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.

Featured

  • FCW PERSPECTIVES
    sensor network (agsandrew/Shutterstock.com)

    Are agencies really ready for EIS?

    The telecom contract has the potential to reinvent IT infrastructure, but finding the bandwidth to take full advantage could prove difficult.

  • People
    Dave Powner, GAO

    Dave Powner audits the state of federal IT

    The GAO director of information technology issues is leaving government after 16 years. On his way out the door, Dave Powner details how far govtech has come in the past two decades and flags the most critical issues he sees facing federal IT leaders.

  • FCW Illustration.  Original Images: Shutterstock, Airbnb

    Should federal contracting be more like Airbnb?

    Steve Kelman believes a lighter touch and a bit more trust could transform today's compliance culture.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.