Letter: Performance objectives not always relevant to mission

Regarding "DOD, OPM issue proposed rules for NSPS": It has be my experience that [a] higher-level review of performance objectives does not ensure appropriateness in and across the organization. It tends to create generic objectives based on overall high-level organizational objectives. The importance of critical support objectives is diluted and exceptional performance is not rewarded fairly.

Case in point: My supervisor spent hours in training learning how to create meaningful objectives for his organization where he felt that he could evaluate performance. When forwarded to the higher-level review, the objectives were changed and did not represent the day-to-day tasks performed in support of the mission. End result was consistent (generic) objectives that were not necessarily appropriate at the "grassroots" level.

James Bickerton

What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to [email protected] (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.

Featured

  • Cybersecurity
    Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas  (U.S. Coast Guard photo by Petty Officer 3rd Class Lora Ratliff)

    Mayorkas announces cyber 'sprints' on ransomware, ICS, workforce

    The Homeland Security secretary announced a series of focused efforts to address issues around ransomware, critical infrastructure and the agency's workforce that will all be launched in the coming weeks.

  • IT Modernization
    Blue Signage and logo of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

    VA plans 'strategic review' of $16B software program

    New Veterans Affairs chief Denis McDonough announced a "strategic review" of the agency's Electronic Health Record Modernization program of up to 12 weeks.

Stay Connected