Letter: Performance objectives not always relevant to mission

Regarding "DOD, OPM issue proposed rules for NSPS": It has be my experience that [a] higher-level review of performance objectives does not ensure appropriateness in and across the organization. It tends to create generic objectives based on overall high-level organizational objectives. The importance of critical support objectives is diluted and exceptional performance is not rewarded fairly.

Case in point: My supervisor spent hours in training learning how to create meaningful objectives for his organization where he felt that he could evaluate performance. When forwarded to the higher-level review, the objectives were changed and did not represent the day-to-day tasks performed in support of the mission. End result was consistent (generic) objectives that were not necessarily appropriate at the "grassroots" level.

James Bickerton

What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to [email protected] (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.

Featured

  • Elections
    voting security

    'Unprecedented' challenges to safe, secure 2020 vote

    Our election infrastructure is bending under the stress of multiple crises. Administrators say they are doing all they can to ensure it doesn't break.

  • FCW Perspectives
    zero trust network

    Can government get to zero trust?

    Today's hybrid infrastructures and highly mobile workforces need the protection zero trust security can provide. Too bad there are obstacles at almost every turn.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.