GAO: Congress should update privacy laws

Congress should consider revising privacy laws to ensure that the sensitive data the government collects and uses is appropriately protected, said Linda Koontz, director of information management issues at the Government Accountability Office.

Current laws and guidance governing the federal government’s collection, use and disclosure of personal information have gaps and other shortcomings, Koontz told the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee today.

Although the Privacy Act, the E-Government Act and guidance from the Office of Management and Budget set minimum privacy requirements for agencies, they might not consistently protect personally identifiable information in all circumstances, she testified.

Those laws and guidance might not limit agencies' collection and use of personal information to specific purposes, and definitions are too narrow, Koontz said. She added that technologies, data use and information sharing have changed dramatically since the Privacy Act was written in 1974.

To comply with the Privacy Act, agencies must notify the public via a notice in the Federal Register whenever they create a system of records that contains personal information. The notice defines the scope of the data to be collected and how it will be used, a GAO report states.

However, the notices don’t always provide enough information about the data collected, and they can be difficult for the public to understand, Koontz said.

Only modest limitations exist on sharing personal data among federal agencies, she added, and they increasingly need to share data with state and local agencies and the private sector.

“But there’s no onward transfer of provisions that assure privacy travels with the data,” Koontz said. “This is a concern. We need stronger protections because we foresee more sharing.”

GAO recommended that Congress:
* Revise the scope of the laws to cover all personally identifiable information collected, used and maintained by the federal government.
* Set requirements to ensure that the collection and use of personal data is limited to the stated purpose.
* Establish additional mechanisms for informing the public about privacy protections.

About the Author

Mary Mosquera is a reporter for Federal Computer Week.

Featured

  • Contracting
    8 prototypes of the border walls as tweeted by CBP San Diego

    DHS contractors face protests – on the streets

    Tech companies are facing protests internally from workers and externally from activists about doing for government amid controversial policies like "zero tolerance" for illegal immigration.

  • Workforce
    By Mark Van Scyoc Royalty-free stock photo ID: 285175268

    At OPM, Weichert pushes direct hire, pay agent changes

    Margaret Weichert, now acting director of the Office of Personnel Management, is clearing agencies to make direct hires in IT, cyber and other tech fields and is changing pay for specialized occupations.

  • Cloud
    Shutterstock ID ID: 222190471 By wk1003mike

    IBM protests JEDI cloud deal

    As the deadline to submit bids on the Pentagon's $10 billion, 10-year warfighter cloud deal draws near, IBM announced a legal protest.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.