Letter: AtHoc not a de facto alert platform for military

I am writing you regarding your wonderful article ["Smart phones, smart leadership"].

In that article, Guy Miasnik, CEO of Athoc, Inc. states:

At DOD, AtHoc is the de facto standard for such capabilities for the Navy and Air Force, Miasnik said. As many as 400,000 employees in each of those services is covered by AtHoc's unified notification system, he said.

Nothing could be further from the truth. This statement is reckless and misinforms our military personnel and all readers of the article that AtHoc's alert platform is a "de facto" alert platform for the Navy and Air Force.

Our company is AtHoc's main competitor in this space. We have numerous sales to the U.S. Military worldwide including iconic institutions such as The United States Military Academy at West Point and The United States Air Force Academy.

We have spoken to high ranking military officials who have corroborated our view that "Athoc is not a de facto" implementation for these military organizations.

Such misinformation needs to be corrected.

Howard Ryan
Founder and CEO
Desktop Alert Inc.


What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to letters@fcw.com (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.

Featured

  • Cybersecurity

    DHS floats 'collective defense' model for cybersecurity

    Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wants her department to have a more direct role in defending the private sector and critical infrastructure entities from cyberthreats.

  • Defense
    Defense Secretary James Mattis testifies at an April 12 hearing of the House Armed Services Committee.

    Mattis: Cloud deal not tailored for Amazon

    On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to quell "rumors" that the Pentagon's planned single-award cloud acquisition was designed with Amazon Web Services in mind.

  • Census
    shutterstock image

    2020 Census to include citizenship question

    The Department of Commerce is breaking with recent practice and restoring a question about respondent citizenship last used in 1950, despite being urged not to by former Census directors and outside experts.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.