GAO gets good reviews for quality

The government's watchdog has watchdogs of its own, and today two of them gave good reviews of the Government Accountability Office's internal quality assurance systems.

Two teams of auditors -- one international and the other working for KPMG -- issued "clean opinions" on GAO’s quality assurance systems.

A clean opinion means the teams found no significant issues that need remediation. GAO is required to undergo the audits every three years.

"I am pleased by the vote of confidence in GAO's quality assurance practices," said Gene Dodaro, acting comptroller general at the agency. "GAO is known for providing lawmakers and agency heads with timely, reliable information on government operations. The two peer reviews confirm that this reputation is well deserved."

The Auditor General of Canada, GAO's counterpart north of the border, led the international peer review team. That office and KPMG conducted the previous reviews in 2004, which also resulted in clean opinions.

About the Author

Technology journalist Michael Hardy is a former FCW editor.

Featured

  • FCW PERSPECTIVES
    sensor network (agsandrew/Shutterstock.com)

    Are agencies really ready for EIS?

    The telecom contract has the potential to reinvent IT infrastructure, but finding the bandwidth to take full advantage could prove difficult.

  • People
    Dave Powner, GAO

    Dave Powner audits the state of federal IT

    The GAO director of information technology issues is leaving government after 16 years. On his way out the door, Dave Powner details how far govtech has come in the past two decades and flags the most critical issues he sees facing federal IT leaders.

  • FCW Illustration.  Original Images: Shutterstock, Airbnb

    Should federal contracting be more like Airbnb?

    Steve Kelman believes a lighter touch and a bit more trust could transform today's compliance culture.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.