Letter: No fairness under pay for performance systems

Regarding: "Unions say NSPS rules could hurt DOD employees": “Working behind closed doors, supervisors and managers will decide who gets more performance pay,” making the system vulnerable to favoritism and personal biases, they said.

Without a doubt this practice is rampant (favoritism and personal biases), and I have been greatly penalized under NSPS.

Being first in our organization, to be "promoted" from legacy GS-14 (step 6) to NSPS YC-03...I was a warning to those who followed!! In the GS system, my promotion to GS-15 (step 3) would have yielded the minimum 7.5 percent pay increase. Under NSPS, GS-14 and GS-15 are both Pay Band 3, therefore viewed as a "management reassignment" with a maximum pay increase of 5
percent. Our workforce operations personnel said not to worry that management would probably more than compensate for the difference at performance rating time.

Instead, it was more demoralizing and humiliating than I could imagine after 23 years of selfless service.  I received the minimum 3 rating to receive 1 "award share" valued at 1.88
percent of my $96,912 base salary -- $1,824 base salary increase ($70.15 a pay period)!!! This was my first full year to reap some benefit from 16 consecutive grueling months of study to earn two masters degrees -- MBA and Public Administration! As Division Chief for Information Management, I coordinated and lead the massive relocation of over 125 personnel, in addition to overwhelming AF budget submission requirements, as well as launching, evaluating, and reporting on the pilot of a new Budget Formulation system.

Conversely, a colleague (a very good friend) 20 years my junior [who was already a GS-15 when converted to NSPS so didn't experience the pay cut I did] decided to leave Air Force and her Division Chief (YC-03) position to take a YA-03 (didn't want supervisor responsibilities) in the Marine Corps after serving 11 years in the AF. Her division was a single mission with no other duties as assigned, and in spite of her well advertised departure, she received a high enough rating to earn four shares valued at $7,296 ($1,824*4). I don't know remember what her salary to Bonus ratio was, but this example illustrates the unbridled authority managers have to exercise favoritism and personal biases with reckless abandon and without consequences of appeal rights for workers covered by NSPS.

Fairness was definitely not a factor in this example, and sadly my retirement income was severely jeopardized. Yet, my friend has MANY years to earn retirement.

 Fairness??

Anonymous

What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to letters@fcw.com (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.

Featured

  • Contracting
    8 prototypes of the border walls as tweeted by CBP San Diego

    DHS contractors face protests – on the streets

    Tech companies are facing protests internally from workers and externally from activists about doing for government amid controversial policies like "zero tolerance" for illegal immigration.

  • Workforce
    By Mark Van Scyoc Royalty-free stock photo ID: 285175268

    At OPM, Weichert pushes direct hire, pay agent changes

    Margaret Weichert, now acting director of the Office of Personnel Management, is clearing agencies to make direct hires in IT, cyber and other tech fields and is changing pay for specialized occupations.

  • Cloud
    Shutterstock ID ID: 222190471 By wk1003mike

    IBM protests JEDI cloud deal

    As the deadline to submit bids on the Pentagon's $10 billion, 10-year warfighter cloud deal draws near, IBM announced a legal protest.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.