Letter: Internet gateways need more security

Regarding "OMB: Agencies must shed more gateways": I think it is a good move for the government to get [Trusted Internet Connections]  locked down, but I do see significant problems with open gateways to federal and Defense contractors and their subcontractors.

E-mail is no way secure and easy to store and forward to our enemies, foreign and domestic. Encrypted e-mail is still elusive due to varying standards and problems with ease of use. I would suggest the federal government roll out a collaborative program to secure the Internet pathways to the major defense contractors first and then move into securing domestic partners.

Similar to secure Web sites it should be easy for the user to determine if the e-mail is protected or out in the open. Of course any e-mail can be forwarded to an ISP account, so the bleeding can be stopped. The major issue is our enemies lurking outside the TIC gathering intelligence against us.

Anonymous

What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to letters@fcw.com (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.

Featured

  • Defense
    Ryan D. McCarthy being sworn in as Army Secretary Oct. 10, 2019. (Photo credit: Sgt. Dana Clarke/U.S. Army)

    Army wants to spend nearly $1B on cloud, data by 2025

    Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy said lack of funding or a potential delay in the JEDI cloud bid "strikes to the heart of our concern."

  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.