Letter: The real issue: Voter-verified paper records

Regarding "House defeats paper ballot funding": [In] writing about the shortcomings of touchscreen voting machines, you missed the point.

It's not that there's no paper record. It's that even if there is a paper record it's a record that the voter has not had the opportunity to verify. So a "recount" of the paper stored inside the machine tells you nothing about whether the machine accurately recorded the voter's intention. That can only be done with a voter-verified paper record.

That's why most jurisdictions that have used touchscreen machines are going back to voter-marked paper ballots, counted with optical scanners -- if not this year then certainly by 2010.

Michael Berla

What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to [email protected] (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.

Featured

  • FCW Perspectives
    zero trust network

    Why zero trust is having a moment

    Improved technologies and growing threats have agencies actively pursuing dynamic and context-driven security.

  • Workforce
    online collaboration (elenabsl/Shutterstock.com)

    Federal employee job satisfaction climbed during pandemic

    The survey documents the rapid change to teleworking postures in government under the COVID-19 pandemic.

Stay Connected