Reader comment roundup

Mandatory public service with experience
Regarding "Poll: Should there be mandatory civil service?": Mandatory civil service could also help with the issue of low government pay for high quality and experienced employees. The civil service should be two or three years, and one of those years should be during one's 40s, when experience and competency are high.  Enough of this me-first forever crap.
Anonymous


Hope for more security
Regarding "Hawley: Secure Flight set to take off":  I think the weakness is the birth date, since we have no way to validate it.  I am sure terrorists will not forget to use their actual birth date and year.
Other than that, it should be more effective than the current system. It also is more fair to the airlines, since this type of check is a [government] job not theirs.
Anonymous


Do away with DHS
Regarding "Panel flags DHS transition fears": While I personally have no use for the Department of Homeland Security and would like to see it taken over by the Justice Department, I find this article interesting and in some strange manner reassuring.  As long as we must suffer, DHS, I would like to see fewer political hacks in command. I agree with the idea that these should be true professionals.
Anonymous


Trilogy project didn't fail
Regarding "GAO: FBI needs to refine cost controls for Sentinel": This article refers to "the failed Trilogy project." This is inaccurate in that two of the three Trilogy components were successfully deployed. The third, the Virtual Case File, didn't technically fail; it was scrapped because it became clear that there were better approaches not available at the inception of the program.
Anonymous


Call for efficiency
Regarding "What acquisition employees want": I am so glad Mr. Kempf is happy in his job.  I'll be happy when he and his agency can do their job more efficiently and effectively. Does that still matter? For example, when Mr. Kempf and his colleagues can get the Alliant contract awarded and functioning, his agency, its clients, industry, and the taxpayer will all be better off. That will be a time for more happiness.
Anonymous


Why create a TIC contract?
Regarding "GSA to add TIC to Networx contracts": This sounds like another wasted effort by [the General Services Administration] …why is GSA "selling" this to agencies when it is a directive. Is there real demand to buy [Trusted Internet Connections] service (whatever that it is) from a commercial provider when the [government] should be protecting themselves internally? Does GSA have a business case to justify the efforts to create a TIC contract?
Anonymous

What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to letters@fcw.com (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.

Featured

  • Cybersecurity

    DHS floats 'collective defense' model for cybersecurity

    Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wants her department to have a more direct role in defending the private sector and critical infrastructure entities from cyberthreats.

  • Defense
    Defense Secretary James Mattis testifies at an April 12 hearing of the House Armed Services Committee.

    Mattis: Cloud deal not tailored for Amazon

    On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to quell "rumors" that the Pentagon's planned single-award cloud acquisition was designed with Amazon Web Services in mind.

  • Census
    shutterstock image

    2020 Census to include citizenship question

    The Department of Commerce is breaking with recent practice and restoring a question about respondent citizenship last used in 1950, despite being urged not to by former Census directors and outside experts.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.