Letter: Delays in government valid, not sign of mediocrity

Regarding "Editorial: Encouraging mediocrity": A generalization of mediocrity based on two incidents is faulty. 

In my own experience, we had about 50 applicants each for two recent vacancies.  With those numbers -- if you check references --  you don't get mediocre.  Even looking at Dorobek's two exceptions, his analysis is flawed. 

The appointments have been delayed because of mismanagement and conflict of interest.  These are sound, nonpartisan reasons to delay appointments. Dorobek doesn't describe the mismanagement, but the conflict of interest issue would concern me from just the little data in the article.  Contrary to Dorobek's conclusion, a lazy, mediocre government may have sped these nominations through.

Joseph Wendlberger


What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to [email protected] (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.

Featured

  • Government Innovation Awards
    Government Innovation Awards - https://governmentinnovationawards.com

    Congratulations to the 2021 Rising Stars

    These early-career leaders already are having an outsized impact on government IT.

  • Acquisition
    Shutterstock ID 169474442 By Maxx-Studio

    The growing importance of GWACs

    One of the government's most popular methods for buying emerging technologies and critical IT services faces significant challenges in an ever-changing marketplace

Stay Connected