Letter: Delays in government valid, not sign of mediocrity

Regarding "Editorial: Encouraging mediocrity": A generalization of mediocrity based on two incidents is faulty. 

In my own experience, we had about 50 applicants each for two recent vacancies.  With those numbers -- if you check references --  you don't get mediocre.  Even looking at Dorobek's two exceptions, his analysis is flawed. 

The appointments have been delayed because of mismanagement and conflict of interest.  These are sound, nonpartisan reasons to delay appointments. Dorobek doesn't describe the mismanagement, but the conflict of interest issue would concern me from just the little data in the article.  Contrary to Dorobek's conclusion, a lazy, mediocre government may have sped these nominations through.

Joseph Wendlberger


What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to letters@fcw.com (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.

Featured

  • IT Modernization
    Eisenhower Executive Office Building (Image: Wikimedia Commons)

    OMB's user guide to the MGT Act

    The Office of Management and Budget is working on a rules-of-the-road document to cover how agencies can seek and use funds under the MGT Act.

  • global network (Pushish Images/Shutterstock.com)

    As others see us -- a few surprises

    A recent dinner with civil servants from Asia delivered some interesting insights, Steve Kelman writes.

  • FCW Perspectives
    cloud (Singkham/Shutterstock.com)

    A smarter approach to cloud

    Advances in cloud technology are shifting the focus toward choosing the right tool for the job and crafting solutions that truly modernize systems.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.