Letter: Delays in government valid, not sign of mediocrity

Regarding "Editorial: Encouraging mediocrity": A generalization of mediocrity based on two incidents is faulty. 

In my own experience, we had about 50 applicants each for two recent vacancies.  With those numbers -- if you check references --  you don't get mediocre.  Even looking at Dorobek's two exceptions, his analysis is flawed. 

The appointments have been delayed because of mismanagement and conflict of interest.  These are sound, nonpartisan reasons to delay appointments. Dorobek doesn't describe the mismanagement, but the conflict of interest issue would concern me from just the little data in the article.  Contrary to Dorobek's conclusion, a lazy, mediocre government may have sped these nominations through.

Joseph Wendlberger


What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to [email protected] (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.

Featured

  • People
    2021 Federal 100 Awards

    Announcing the 2021 Federal 100 Award winners

    Meet the women and men being honored for their exceptional contributions to federal IT.

  • Comment
    Diverse Workforce (Image: Shutterstock)

    Who cares if you wear a hoodie or a suit? It’s the mission that matters most

    Responding to Steve Kelman's recent blog post, Alan Thomas shares the inside story on 18F's evolution.

Stay Connected