Letter: Delays in government valid, not sign of mediocrity

Regarding "Editorial: Encouraging mediocrity": A generalization of mediocrity based on two incidents is faulty. 

In my own experience, we had about 50 applicants each for two recent vacancies.  With those numbers -- if you check references --  you don't get mediocre.  Even looking at Dorobek's two exceptions, his analysis is flawed. 

The appointments have been delayed because of mismanagement and conflict of interest.  These are sound, nonpartisan reasons to delay appointments. Dorobek doesn't describe the mismanagement, but the conflict of interest issue would concern me from just the little data in the article.  Contrary to Dorobek's conclusion, a lazy, mediocre government may have sped these nominations through.

Joseph Wendlberger


What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to [email protected] (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.

Featured

  • Comment
    customer experience (garagestock/Shutterstock.com)

    Leveraging the TMF to improve customer experience

    Focusing on customer experience as part of the Technology Modernization Fund investment strategy will enable agencies to improve service and build trust in government.

  • FCW Perspectives
    zero trust network

    Why zero trust is having a moment

    Improved technologies and growing threats have agencies actively pursuing dynamic and context-driven security.

Stay Connected