Letter: Coburn's report barely scratches the surface

Regarding "Senator: Fed workers miss millions of hours": This report is only the tip of the iceberg.

The federal government is an environment in which performance is rarely measured in any meaningful way and employees cannot be fired. No one should feign surprise at this report. Beyond the topic of the report, there are things that are not captured in any agency's data. I know many federal employees who routinely report to work at 10 and are home by 3:30. I used to work with some of these people. While "at work," they run errands all day on the clock. This is not all feds, but it is also not unusual.

I have noticed that feds I travel with routinely take a day before travel and a day after away from the office but do not charge it to vacation. Frankly, they travel too much and do little while on the road. So how do we fix this? More telecommuting? That will directly result in an even less productive fed workforce. What the fed needs are meaningful measures of workforce productivity and value returned to the taxpayer.  

Anonymous


What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to letters@fcw.com (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.

Featured

  • Cybersecurity

    DHS floats 'collective defense' model for cybersecurity

    Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wants her department to have a more direct role in defending the private sector and critical infrastructure entities from cyberthreats.

  • Defense
    Defense Secretary James Mattis testifies at an April 12 hearing of the House Armed Services Committee.

    Mattis: Cloud deal not tailored for Amazon

    On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to quell "rumors" that the Pentagon's planned single-award cloud acquisition was designed with Amazon Web Services in mind.

  • Census
    shutterstock image

    2020 Census to include citizenship question

    The Department of Commerce is breaking with recent practice and restoring a question about respondent citizenship last used in 1950, despite being urged not to by former Census directors and outside experts.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.