Editorial: A cure for set-aside ills

There’s no doubt that the government’s small-business contracting mandates are a regular source of heartburn for federal procurement officials. Even as they face the prospect of higher goals for small-business contracting overall, many agencies are still struggling to meet their goals for specific groups, such as woman- and veteran-owned businesses.

These small-business requirements, coupled with the ongoing pressure to ensure adequate levels of competition in contracting overall, are part of what make the federal government so alien to procurement professionals coming from the commercial market.

Strangely enough, though, the best antidote to these peculiarities of the federal market is good old-fashioned business savvy.

As reported in last week’s issue of Federal Computer Week (“Making noise for small business”), small-business advocates find that many contracting officers prefer the path of least resistance: Sticking with big systems integrators that already work with their agencies.

These companies have the advantage of offering a wide array of services, making them a logical choice for any number of projects. From that perspective, setting aside work for small businesses feels like a necessary but poor business decision.

But such a perspective ignores the role that small businesses have always played in the government market. Many small firms specialize in niche technologies or services, often picking areas of particular interest to government agencies. They stay in business by developing a depth of expertise not available in many larger companies.

The challenge — this is where the business savvy comes in — is recognizing the opportunities where small businesses bring a lot to the table.

Clearly, some projects will be too large for small companies to consider, while other projects are too basic, providing no edge to specialty firms. However, small-business advocates typically find that numerous programs offer plenty of viable prospects for set-aside contracts. It’s just a matter of recognizing how a particular set of suppliers can meet a given demand.

Meeting those set-aside requirements will never be easy. But procurement officials will have a much easier time of it if they focus on the business challenge, rather than the regulatory stomach ache. 

About the Author

John Monroe is Senior Events Editor for the 1105 Public Sector Media Group, where he is responsible for overseeing the development of content for print and online content, as well as events. John has more than 20 years of experience covering the information technology field. Most recently he served as Editor-in-Chief of Federal Computer Week. Previously, he served as editor of three sister publications: civic.com, which covered the state and local government IT market, Government Health IT, and Defense Systems.

Featured

  • Contracting
    8 prototypes of the border walls as tweeted by CBP San Diego

    DHS contractors face protests – on the streets

    Tech companies are facing protests internally from workers and externally from activists about doing for government amid controversial policies like "zero tolerance" for illegal immigration.

  • Workforce
    By Mark Van Scyoc Royalty-free stock photo ID: 285175268

    At OPM, Weichert pushes direct hire, pay agent changes

    Margaret Weichert, now acting director of the Office of Personnel Management, is clearing agencies to make direct hires in IT, cyber and other tech fields and is changing pay for specialized occupations.

  • Cloud
    Shutterstock ID ID: 222190471 By wk1003mike

    IBM protests JEDI cloud deal

    As the deadline to submit bids on the Pentagon's $10 billion, 10-year warfighter cloud deal draws near, IBM announced a legal protest.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.