Letter: GSA should lead contract consolidations

Regarding "Acquisition workforce called underdeveloped": There are not too few contracting people. There are too many contracting offices and too many contracts.

[The Homeland Security Department], the Navy, Army, Marines, and every other Air Force base in the country should not have it's own contract shops, nor their own set of [indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity] vehicles.

If Congress wants to fix the problem, they will have to consolidate the acquisition line of business in one agency where buyers pay as they go, and multiple offices operate with consistent rules aiming to compete with levels of service. GSA could accomplish this.

Up until 2003, they were. Then every CO in government decided they needed to copy the GSA model -- only with budgeted funding. Get [the Defense Department] and DHS and the agencies with more important primary missions out of the routine acquisition business. They not only deplete qualified personnel, but they build duplicate contracts and acquisition systems. Other solutions will not work and will spend lots of lots of money. Our acquisition personnel shortage is self-inflicted by bureaucrats with a rice bowl mentality.

Anonymous

What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to [email protected] (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.

Featured

  • Comment
    customer experience (garagestock/Shutterstock.com)

    Leveraging the TMF to improve customer experience

    Focusing on customer experience as part of the Technology Modernization Fund investment strategy will enable agencies to improve service and build trust in government.

  • FCW Perspectives
    zero trust network

    Why zero trust is having a moment

    Improved technologies and growing threats have agencies actively pursuing dynamic and context-driven security.

Stay Connected