Letter: Officials need all contracts in toolbox

Regarding "McCain wants to end cost-plus contracting": Removing any type of contract from the government's toolbox reduces the government's ability to manage risk and results in increased expenses to the government.

Removing cost-plus contracts means the government must be responsible for completely developing the requirements and work scope, which will cost money and delay work. It will also result in overall higher costs because contractors, in order to stay healthy, must bid firm fixed-price contracts much differently than other types of contracts. For example, firm fixed-price contracts demand a reserve and higher rates.

Sen. McCain's suggestion would result in a contract freeze similar to the current credit freeze. To reverse the contract freeze, the government will end up paying more for the same work.

Anonymous


What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to letters@fcw.com (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.


Featured

  • Telecommunications
    Stock photo ID: 658810513 By asharkyu

    GSA extends EIS deadline to 2023

    Agencies are getting up to three more years on existing telecom contracts before having to shift to the $50 billion Enterprise Infrastructure Solutions vehicle.

  • Workforce
    Shutterstock image ID: 569172169 By Zenzen

    OMB looks to retrain feds to fill cyber needs

    The federal government is taking steps to fill high-demand, skills-gap positions in tech by retraining employees already working within agencies without a cyber or IT background.

  • Acquisition
    GSA Headquarters (Photo by Rena Schild/Shutterstock)

    GSA to consolidate multiple award schedules

    The General Services Administration plans to consolidate dozens of its buying schedules across product areas including IT and services to reduce duplication.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.