Letter: Innovation is a tough sell

Regarding "Advice on renewing innovation": Innovation is being stifled on multiple levels.

Venture capitalists have flatly told me that they do not fund science. They want to know who your management team is and what products have they successfully brought to market already.

I have had conversations with the heads of technology associations who freely admit a big disconnect between business and academia, but when I try to schedule a meeting about overcoming it, I get no response. When I have tried to contact the POCs for a number of Defense Department solicitations to ask questions, they answer neither e-mails nor phone messages. I have also noticed that DOD solicitations frequently say that other government entities cannot respond. In some of those cases, those other entities have already solved the problem being solicited for, so the taxpayer pays twice.

No one is really interested in innovation; it is too messy and hard to schedule. One of my most memorable moments was when, upon completion of a prototype medical device, I was asked in all seriousness by the business manager, " Now that you have the prototype, what problems are you going to find and how long will it take to fix them?" My answer of "I don't know" was not well received. Got to put troubleshooting time on the schedule.

If you are not an employee of a company with a presence in the field already, getting innovative ideas accepted, funded or even looked at is virtually impossible.

There seems to be a great myth to the effect that everyone wants to start their own company. I do not. The things that make me a good innovator would make me a lousy businessman. I think that is true of a huge number of innovative people, and since the market only sees the business aspects, vast numbers of good ideas fall to the ground without any real chance of contributing to the betterment of mankind.

One last quote to close out. A venture capitalist said to me a couple of years ago, "If no one is already buying something like this, there is no market, so we are not interested."

A short enumeration says that by that logic, they would not have funded the airplane, the personal computer, the electric light, the automobile, etc.

Innovation is down because you cannot guarantee success, and that is what the funding sources want.

John Companion
Virginia Space Grant Consortium


What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to letters@fcw.com (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.


Featured

  • Cybersecurity

    DHS floats 'collective defense' model for cybersecurity

    Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wants her department to have a more direct role in defending the private sector and critical infrastructure entities from cyberthreats.

  • Defense
    Defense Secretary James Mattis testifies at an April 12 hearing of the House Armed Services Committee.

    Mattis: Cloud deal not tailored for Amazon

    On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to quell "rumors" that the Pentagon's planned single-award cloud acquisition was designed with Amazon Web Services in mind.

  • Census
    shutterstock image

    2020 Census to include citizenship question

    The Department of Commerce is breaking with recent practice and restoring a question about respondent citizenship last used in 1950, despite being urged not to by former Census directors and outside experts.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.