Letter: Agencies pay price for outsourcing IT support

Regarding "Advice from a talent manager": This is exactly the problem in the government right now. Although everyone is saying that government is tooooo big, they are not realizing that the workforce in place is leaving and the knowledge of the workforce goes with them.


A lot of the tasks that the government used to support in information technology are now being handed over to contractors and because the majority of the contracts are being given to small firms or given a fixed price, there is no incentive to make it work, only to make sure it doesn't break. It also seems that the contract staff have no incentive [to improve their skill levels] because if you can meet minimal service level agreement metrics, that is what is counted -- not actually thinking on how to save time and money and make the government work better and maximize the IT investment and technology to support the missions.


Another problem I see in the government is that when someone leaves and takes the knowledge with them, many times things break. There is not really a good way to foster [succession planning], only for the current person to build their own "empire." Once the empire has been built, I have often seen it crumble after the person leaves and it seems more and more that this is becoming the norm. When one of these empires crumbles, someone else picks up some of the parts and misses many of the important things.


The government is now leaving operations of their critical infrastructure to contractors which are generally staffing with low-dollar labor and that meet many of the minimum requirements. Although this may sound like a good idea, whenever the contracts turn over, a lot of knowledge is lost because of the rapid staff turnover due to a contract being awarded to a new company that met several of the small business needs of an agency.


I think that this is a larger issue than just losing old federal staff. I think that we need to figure out how government should run and if we want to hand over the critical information technology functions within the government to contract staff that has only one thought in mind: money and their bottom line.


Anonymous


Let us know what you think by sending a letter to the editor.

Featured

  • Cybersecurity

    DHS floats 'collective defense' model for cybersecurity

    Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wants her department to have a more direct role in defending the private sector and critical infrastructure entities from cyberthreats.

  • Defense
    Defense Secretary James Mattis testifies at an April 12 hearing of the House Armed Services Committee.

    Mattis: Cloud deal not tailored for Amazon

    On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to quell "rumors" that the Pentagon's planned single-award cloud acquisition was designed with Amazon Web Services in mind.

  • Census
    shutterstock image

    2020 Census to include citizenship question

    The Department of Commerce is breaking with recent practice and restoring a question about respondent citizenship last used in 1950, despite being urged not to by former Census directors and outside experts.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.