Letter: Cost-plus contracts have minimal effect on federal budget

Regarding "Is cost-plus debate off point?"

I can see how cost-plus contracts can be risky for the government in some development programs, but they are hardly a major factor in driving up the federal budget.

Sen. McCain has a way of making mountains from molehills to score points, e.g., the nonsense about earmarks. Earmarks amount to a trivial part of the budget and eliminating them would result in trivial savings. Furthermore, not all earmarks are "bridges to nowhere" or exotic biological research projects.

Cost-plus contracts are more desirable for the government in the support services arena, where the risk (if it's an award fee contract) is transferred to the contractor. That's the sort of contract I'm presently under.

Ralph Hitchens

What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to letters@fcw.com (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.

Featured

  • Telecommunications
    Stock photo ID: 658810513 By asharkyu

    GSA extends EIS deadline to 2023

    Agencies are getting up to three more years on existing telecom contracts before having to shift to the $50 billion Enterprise Infrastructure Solutions vehicle.

  • Workforce
    Shutterstock image ID: 569172169 By Zenzen

    OMB looks to retrain feds to fill cyber needs

    The federal government is taking steps to fill high-demand, skills-gap positions in tech by retraining employees already working within agencies without a cyber or IT background.

  • Acquisition
    GSA Headquarters (Photo by Rena Schild/Shutterstock)

    GSA to consolidate multiple award schedules

    The General Services Administration plans to consolidate dozens of its buying schedules across product areas including IT and services to reduce duplication.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.