Letter: Cost-plus contracts have minimal effect on federal budget

Regarding "Is cost-plus debate off point?"

I can see how cost-plus contracts can be risky for the government in some development programs, but they are hardly a major factor in driving up the federal budget.

Sen. McCain has a way of making mountains from molehills to score points, e.g., the nonsense about earmarks. Earmarks amount to a trivial part of the budget and eliminating them would result in trivial savings. Furthermore, not all earmarks are "bridges to nowhere" or exotic biological research projects.

Cost-plus contracts are more desirable for the government in the support services arena, where the risk (if it's an award fee contract) is transferred to the contractor. That's the sort of contract I'm presently under.

Ralph Hitchens

What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to letters@fcw.com (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.

Featured

  • FCW PERSPECTIVES
    sensor network (agsandrew/Shutterstock.com)

    Are agencies really ready for EIS?

    The telecom contract has the potential to reinvent IT infrastructure, but finding the bandwidth to take full advantage could prove difficult.

  • People
    Dave Powner, GAO

    Dave Powner audits the state of federal IT

    The GAO director of information technology issues is leaving government after 16 years. On his way out the door, Dave Powner details how far govtech has come in the past two decades and flags the most critical issues he sees facing federal IT leaders.

  • FCW Illustration.  Original Images: Shutterstock, Airbnb

    Should federal contracting be more like Airbnb?

    Steve Kelman believes a lighter touch and a bit more trust could transform today's compliance culture.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.