Letter: Campaigns differ on CIOs

Regarding "Campaign surrogates face off at leadership conference"

I attended this conference and would agree that this was quite the entertaining and informative exhange between the representatives from each campaign.

I noticed, however, that you did not mention the two campaigns comments on their opinions on politically appointed chief information officers. The McCain campaign quickly answered by saying CIOs should not be politically appointed. The Obama campaign said most should not be politically appointed, but acknowleged that some might need to be, depending on the changes needed in some specific agencies.

I thought this was a very interesting response from both sides and would have liked to have seen it commented on in this article.

Margaret Sarro

What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to letters@fcw.com (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.

Featured

  • Defense
    Ryan D. McCarthy being sworn in as Army Secretary Oct. 10, 2019. (Photo credit: Sgt. Dana Clarke/U.S. Army)

    Army wants to spend nearly $1B on cloud, data by 2025

    Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy said lack of funding or a potential delay in the JEDI cloud bid "strikes to the heart of our concern."

  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

Stay Connected

FCW INSIDER

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.