Letter: Requirements documents should be clear

Regarding"Editorial: Acquisition on the agenda"

Requirements come from the program offices, not the contracting officers. There is a massive problem with requirements generation from the program offices. Contracting officers can only do so much to make a purse out of a pig's ear. The onus is clearly on the program offices to create clear, unambiguous and sufficient requirements documentation.

The overworked contracting officer can only say no so many times until he or she has little choice but to issue the solicitation. It's not just additional, better trained contracting officers that we need, but more and better trained program/project management systems. The procurement starts with the requirements process. Until that issue is addressed, we will continue to have problems across the board.

A poorly written requirement can lead to exponential problems down the road. I recommend that we make [classes for writing] statements of work/performance work statements/statements of objectives mandatory for contracting officers, contracting officer's technical representatives, and program/project management certification.

Eric

What do you think? Paste a comment in the box below (registration required), or send your comment to letters@fcw.com (subject line: Blog comment) and we'll post it.

Featured

  • Cybersecurity

    DHS floats 'collective defense' model for cybersecurity

    Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wants her department to have a more direct role in defending the private sector and critical infrastructure entities from cyberthreats.

  • Defense
    Defense Secretary James Mattis testifies at an April 12 hearing of the House Armed Services Committee.

    Mattis: Cloud deal not tailored for Amazon

    On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to quell "rumors" that the Pentagon's planned single-award cloud acquisition was designed with Amazon Web Services in mind.

  • Census
    shutterstock image

    2020 Census to include citizenship question

    The Department of Commerce is breaking with recent practice and restoring a question about respondent citizenship last used in 1950, despite being urged not to by former Census directors and outside experts.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.