CRS offers changes for White House tech office

Related Links

CRS report

Congress might consider elevating the role of director of the White House’s Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) to a Cabinet post, and to allow the director to be more active in federal agency coordination, priority-setting and budget allocation, according to a new report by the Congressional Research Service.

“An issue for Congress is what should be the appropriate title, rank, role and responsibilities of OSTP’s Director,” states the 40-page congressional report dated Nov. 10. It was published on the Web by the Federation of American Scientists.

The OSTP was created in 1976 to provide advice to the president. Its director also manages a council that coordinates technology policies governmentwide, establishes goals for federal research and development, and assists federal scientists and engineers in communicating scientific information.

The CRS report suggests that Congress has many options with regard to the office. Lawmakers could consider allowing the president autonomy over the office, or to evaluate whether it is still needed in the White House.

About the Author

Alice Lipowicz is a staff writer covering government 2.0, homeland security and other IT policies for Federal Computer Week.

Featured

  • Cybersecurity

    DHS floats 'collective defense' model for cybersecurity

    Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen wants her department to have a more direct role in defending the private sector and critical infrastructure entities from cyberthreats.

  • Defense
    Defense Secretary James Mattis testifies at an April 12 hearing of the House Armed Services Committee.

    Mattis: Cloud deal not tailored for Amazon

    On Capitol Hill, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to quell "rumors" that the Pentagon's planned single-award cloud acquisition was designed with Amazon Web Services in mind.

  • Census
    shutterstock image

    2020 Census to include citizenship question

    The Department of Commerce is breaking with recent practice and restoring a question about respondent citizenship last used in 1950, despite being urged not to by former Census directors and outside experts.

Stay Connected

FCW Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.