Obama’s CTO: Some assembly required
Experts describe their vision of the government’s top technologist
- By John Stein Monroe
- Dec 05, 2008
President-elect Barack Obama sparked a wave of speculation after he announced his intention to create a new federal chief technology officer as part of his administration. President George W. Bush created a similar office, but after his first CTO, Norm Lorentz, stepped down, it withered.
Obama has an opportunity to remake the position. Tongues have been wagging predictably about whom Obama might choose — would it be a celebrity such as Bill Gates or a seasoned fed such as Alan Balutis? — but also about what the person’s role should be.
The CTO will oversee technology policy and use in the government, but what does that definition mean in practice? What kind of person should be in the position, and how should the federal CTO relate to agency officials? The role offers a unique opportunity to effect real change in the government’s use of technology. Will that potential be realized?
We picked three experienced leaders — Lorentz
, former Environmental Protection Agency Chief Information Officer Kim Nelson
and former Treasury CIO Jim Flyzik
— to discuss the office and its role in the future. We also offer a sampling of what is being written about the CTO in the mainstream media and the blogosphere.
What do you think? Send your reactions or ideas to [email protected]
John Monroe is Senior Events Editor for the 1105 Public Sector Media Group, where he is responsible for overseeing the development of content for print and online content, as well as events. John has more than 20 years of experience covering the information technology field. Most recently he served as Editor-in-Chief of Federal Computer Week. Previously, he served as editor of three sister publications: civic.com, which covered the state and local government IT market, Government Health IT, and Defense Systems.